Khitaryan A G, Matveev N L, Veliev K S, Golovina A A, Mezhunts A V, Abovyan A A, Amegninu J K, Rogut A A, Lyapina V A
Federal State Budgetary Institution Rostov State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Private Healthcare Institution «Clinical Hospital «Russian Railways-Medicine» Rostov-on-Don», Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2022(9):5-13. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia20220915.
Until recently, clinical studies in the field of robotic-assisted surgery have been conducted in Russia only on the basis of the DaVinci system. The advent of a new robotic system separated the concept of «robotic surgery» from DaVinci. An increase in the number of alternative surgical robots will expand the possibilities of studying the functionality of these systems, differences in their operation, safety and efficiency for patients, and convenience for surgeons.
Evaluation of own initial experience of using Senhance robotic surgical system in the work of the general surgery department.
A prospective collection of data on the surgical treatment of patients with various pathologies using the Senhance robotic system was carried out, followed by its analysis in relation to the duration of the operation, the incidence of intraoperative complications and the need for conversion, as well as the volume of blood loss and early postoperative complications.
Now, only perioperative, and early postoperative data are available for analysis. While accumulating our own experience with the Senhance system, we concluded that, since the transition from robotic to manual laparoscopic surgery and vice versa does not require changing of access points and is performed quickly, it is practically expedient to perform some stages of the operation manually, and others using surgical robot. For example, with the help of manual laparoscopy, it is more ergonomic to perform wide tractions and movements of organs and tissues. At the same time, robotic surgery has undeniable advantages when performing lymph node dissection, performing manual sutures, including anastomoses, which does not lead to an increase in the duration of the intervention.
Presented experience of using the Senhance system has shown that it meets the declared indicators of convenience, efficiency and safety of operations in general surgery.
直到最近,俄罗斯机器人辅助手术领域的临床研究仅在达芬奇系统的基础上进行。一种新型机器人系统的出现将“机器人手术”的概念与达芬奇区分开来。替代手术机器人数量的增加将扩大研究这些系统功能、操作差异、对患者的安全性和效率以及对外科医生便利性的可能性。
评估在普通外科工作中使用森海斯机器人手术系统的初步经验。
前瞻性收集使用森海斯机器人系统对各种病症患者进行手术治疗的数据,随后分析手术持续时间、术中并发症发生率、转换需求、失血量以及术后早期并发症情况。
目前,仅有围手术期和术后早期数据可供分析。在积累我们自己使用森海斯系统的经验时,我们得出结论,由于从机器人手术转换为手动腹腔镜手术以及反之转换时无需改变接入点且操作迅速,所以在实际操作中,手动进行手术的某些阶段,其他阶段使用手术机器人是合理的。例如,借助手动腹腔镜,进行器官和组织的广泛牵引和移动更符合人体工程学。同时,机器人手术在进行淋巴结清扫、进行包括吻合术在内的手动缝合时具有不可否认的优势,且不会导致干预时间增加。
所呈现的使用森海斯系统的经验表明,它符合普通外科手术中所宣称操作便利性、效率和安全性的指标。