Division of Cardiology, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct;100(4):530-534. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30362. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
There is a paucity of data on cardiogenic shock (CS) incidence and outcomes among patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD).
Women admitted to the hospital for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with and without SCAD were identified from the United States National Readmission Database from October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. We calculated the incidence of CS among women with AMI with and without SCAD and odds for developing CS after adjusting for baseline characteristics. In addition, we report the utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention, mechanical circulatory support, severe disability surrogates, and 30-day readmission rates.
A total of 664,292 patients admitted for AMI were eligible for analysis, including 6643 patients with SCAD and 657,649 without SCAD. Patients with SCAD were younger (57 years [interquartile range, IQR 48-68] vs. 71 years [IQR 60-81], p < 0.01) and had fewer comorbidities yet had a higher incidence of CS as compared to patients without SCAD (9% vs. 5%, p < 0.01) and remained at elevated risk after adjusting for baseline comorbidities (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.2-1.7]). Among patients who developed CS, those with SCAD had lower in-hospital mortality than non-SCAD (31% vs. 39%, p < 0.01), and were more likely to receive mechanical circulatory support.
In a nationally representative sample of women admitted for AMI, we found that patients with SCAD had a higher risk of developing CS and required more frequent use of mechanical circulatory support but were more likely to survive to discharge than women suffering AMI from causes other than SCAD.
自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)患者中心源性休克(CS)的发病率和结局数据较少。
从 2015 年 10 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日,从美国国家再入院数据库中确定因急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院的伴或不伴 SCAD 的女性患者。我们计算了 AMI 伴或不伴 SCAD 的女性 CS 的发生率,并在调整基线特征后计算发生 CS 的几率。此外,我们报告了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、机械循环支持、严重残疾替代物和 30 天再入院率的使用情况。
共有 664292 名因 AMI 住院的患者符合分析条件,其中 6643 名患者患有 SCAD,657649 名患者没有 SCAD。与无 SCAD 患者相比,SCAD 患者年龄较小(57 岁[四分位距,IQR 48-68]vs. 71 岁[IQR 60-81],p<0.01)且合并症较少,但 CS 发生率较高(9%vs. 5%,p<0.01),且在调整基线合并症后风险仍处于升高状态(调整后的优势比 1.5[95%置信区间,CI 1.2-1.7])。在发生 CS 的患者中,SCAD 患者的院内死亡率低于非 SCAD 患者(31%vs. 39%,p<0.01),更可能接受机械循环支持。
在一项针对因 AMI 住院的女性患者的全国代表性样本中,我们发现 SCAD 患者发生 CS 的风险更高,更需要频繁使用机械循环支持,但与因非 SCAD 原因导致 AMI 的女性相比,更有可能存活至出院。