Suppr超能文献

美国自发性冠状动脉夹层伴心源性休克

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection with Cardiogenic Shock in the United States.

作者信息

Krittanawong Chayakrit, Bandyopadhyay Dhrubajyoti, Patel Neelkumar, Qadeer Yusuf Kamran, Maitra Neil Sagar, Wang Zhen, Alam Mahboob, Sharma Samin, Jneid Hani

机构信息

Cardiology Division, NYU Langone Health and NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.

Department of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02124, USA.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 5;25(3):86. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2503086. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is defined as a non-traumatic separation of the epicardial coronary artery walls that creates a false lumen. SCAD poses a difficult challenge in management, as decisions regarding revascularization and medical management seem to be tailored to the individual patient. We evaluated and compared outcomes based on cardiogenic shock in patients with SCAD utilizing Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) between January 1, 2016, to December 30, 2020.

METHODS

We utilized the NRD 2016-2019 to carry out this study. We evaluated demographics (e.g., age, gender), conventional risk factors, comorbidities present on the index admission, and in-hospital outcomes using their specific ICD-10-CM codes. The primary outcomes were In-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission, and the secondary outcome was to compare the complications in SCAD patient with cardiogenic shock (CS) compared to those without CS.

RESULTS

We analyzed 2473 individuals with SCAD, 2199 of these individuals did not have cardiogenic shock whereas 274 of these individuals did have cardiogenic shock. When comparing SCAD with cardiogenic shock to SCAD without cardiogenic shock, there was a statistically significant increased odds ratio (OR) for death (propensity matched OR 24.93 (7.49-83.05), use of mechanical circulatory support (propensity matched OR 15.30 (6.87-34.04), ventricular tachycardia (propensity matched OR 4.45 (1.92-10.34), utilization of blood transfusions (propensity matched OR 3.82 (1.86-7.87), acute kidney injury (propensity matched OR 4.02 (1.45-11.13), need for mechanical ventilation (propensity matched OR 8.87 (3.53-22.31), and respiratory failure (propensity matched OR 4.95 (1.83-13.41)))))))). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day readmission rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SCAD is a unique condition that can lead to many complications. In our analysis, we showed that SCAD associated with cardiogenic shock compared to SCAD not associated with cardiogenic shock results in greater odds of complications including death, use of mechanical circulatory support, need for blood transfusions, ventricular tachycardia, acute kidney injury, use of mechanical ventilation, and respiratory failure. SCAD with cardiogenic shock represents a significantly critical clinical scenario that requires a multi-disciplinary approach to prevent the many potential complications associated with this disease process.

摘要

背景

自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)被定义为心外膜冠状动脉壁的非创伤性分离,从而形成一个假腔。SCAD在治疗方面带来了艰巨的挑战,因为关于血运重建和药物治疗的决策似乎要根据个体患者量身定制。我们利用全国再入院数据库(NRD)评估并比较了2016年1月1日至2020年12月30日期间SCAD患者发生心源性休克后的结局。

方法

我们利用2016 - 2019年的NRD进行这项研究。我们使用特定的ICD - 10 - CM编码评估人口统计学特征(如年龄、性别)、传统风险因素、首次入院时存在的合并症以及住院结局。主要结局是住院死亡率和30天再入院率,次要结局是比较发生心源性休克(CS)的SCAD患者与未发生CS的SCAD患者的并发症情况。

结果

我们分析了2473例SCAD患者,其中2199例未发生心源性休克,而274例发生了心源性休克。将发生心源性休克的SCAD患者与未发生心源性休克的SCAD患者进行比较时,死亡的比值比(OR)有统计学显著升高(倾向评分匹配后的OR为24.93(7.49 - 83.05))、使用机械循环支持(倾向评分匹配后的OR为15.30(6.87 - 34.04))、室性心动过速(倾向评分匹配后的OR为4.45(1.92 - 10.34))、输血的使用(倾向评分匹配后的OR为3.82(1.86 - 7.87))、急性肾损伤(倾向评分匹配后的OR为4.02(1.45 - 11.13))、需要机械通气(倾向评分匹配后的OR为8.87(3.53 - 22.31))以及呼吸衰竭(倾向评分匹配后的OR为4.95(1.83 - 13.41))。两组之间的30天再入院率没有统计学显著差异。

结论

SCAD是一种独特的病症,可导致许多并发症。在我们的分析中,我们表明与未发生心源性休克的SCAD相比,发生心源性休克的SCAD导致包括死亡、使用机械循环支持、输血需求、室性心动过速、急性肾损伤、使用机械通气和呼吸衰竭等并发症的几率更高。发生心源性休克的SCAD代表了一种极其危急的临床情况,需要多学科方法来预防与该疾病过程相关的许多潜在并发症。

相似文献

1
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection with Cardiogenic Shock in the United States.美国自发性冠状动脉夹层伴心源性休克
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 5;25(3):86. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2503086. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
Hospital Outcomes of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection With Concurrent Ventricular Arrhythmias.伴有并发室性心律失常的自发性冠状动脉夹层的医院结局
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Nov 27;3(3Part A):101231. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101231. eCollection 2024 Mar.

本文引用的文献

4
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection and Cardiogenic Shock: Incidence, Etiology, Management, and Outcomes.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 30;77(12):1592-1594. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.048.
10
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection.自发性冠状动脉夹层。
Can J Cardiol. 2013 Sep;29(9):1027-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.12.018. Epub 2013 Mar 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验