Lång Ulla, Ramsay Hugh, Yates Kathryn, Veijola Juha, Gyllenberg David, Clarke Mary C, Leacy Finbarr P, Gissler Mika, Kelleher Ian
School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Health Science Centre, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Psychiatry, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
World Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;21(3):436-443. doi: 10.1002/wps.21009.
Current strategies to predict psychosis identify only a small proportion of individuals at risk. Additional strategies are needed to increase capacity for pre-diction and prevention of serious mental illness, ideally during childhood and adolescence. One possible approach would be to investigate systems in which psychosis risk factors are concentrated during childhood. One notable such system is represented by Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). Although psychotic disorders are uncommon in CAMHS, many risk factors for psychosis are highly prevalent in young people who enter this system. We hypothesized, therefore, that youth attending CAMHS would be a high-risk group for psychosis if followed into adulthood and, furthermore, that CAMHS systems would capture a substantial proportion of future psychosis cases. We constructed a total population cohort study of all Finns born in 1987 (N=55,875), linking together extensive register data on health care contacts from birth through age 28 years. We identified all individuals diagnosed with a psychotic or bipolar disorder by age 28 (N=1,785). The risk of psychosis/bipolar disorder by age 28 years was 1.8% for individuals who had not attended CAMHS during childhood or adolescence, whereas it was 12.8% for those with a history of any outpatient CAMHS contact (odds ratio, OR=7.9, 95% CI: 7.2-8.7). Furthermore, the risk of psychosis/bipolar disorder by age 28 years was 2.3% for individuals without a history of inpatient CAMHS admission, whereas it was 24.0% for those with a history of inpatient CAMHS admission (OR=13.3, 95% CI: 11.9-14.9), and 36.5% for those with a history of inpatient CAMHS admission in adolescence (age 13-17 years) (OR=24.2, 95% CI: 21.2-27.6). Individuals who attended CAMHS but received no mental disorder diagnosis had an equally high risk of subsequently developing a psychosis/bipolar disorder as individuals who did receive a diagnosis (OR=0.9, 99.5% CI: 0.7-1.1). Compared to other CAMHS attendees, individuals who developed psychosis or bipolar disorder were more likely to have had an initial CAMHS diagnosis of depressive or other mood disorder (OR=2.3, 99.5% CI: 1.6-3.0) and disruptive behaviour disorder (OR=1.7, 99.5% CI: 1.2-2.5). Of all psychosis/bipolar diagnoses by age 28 years, 50.2% occurred in individuals who had, at some point in childhood or adolescence, attended CAMHS, indicating that CAMHS represent not only a high-risk but also a high-capacity system for prediction of psychosis/bipolar disorder. These findings suggest an enormous, untapped potential for large-scale psychosis/bipolar disorder prediction and prevention research within existing specialist CAMHS.
当前预测精神病的策略仅能识别出一小部分有风险的个体。需要更多策略来提高对严重精神疾病的预测和预防能力,最好是在儿童期和青少年期。一种可能的方法是研究那些在儿童期集中了精神病风险因素的系统。一个值得注意的此类系统是儿童和青少年心理健康服务(CAMHS)。虽然精神病性障碍在CAMHS中并不常见,但许多精神病风险因素在进入该系统的年轻人中非常普遍。因此,我们假设,进入CAMHS的年轻人如果追踪到成年期将是患精神病的高危人群,此外,CAMHS系统将涵盖未来相当比例的精神病病例。我们构建了一项针对1987年出生的所有芬兰人的全人群队列研究(N = 55,875),将从出生到28岁的广泛医疗保健接触登记数据关联在一起。我们确定了所有在28岁前被诊断患有精神病性或双相情感障碍的个体(N = 1,785)。在儿童期或青少年期未参加过CAMHS的个体,到28岁时患精神病/双相情感障碍的风险为1.8%,而有任何门诊CAMHS接触史的个体这一风险为12.8%(优势比,OR = 7.9,95%可信区间:7.2 - 8.7)。此外,没有住院CAMHS入院史的个体到28岁时患精神病/双相情感障碍的风险为2.3%,而有住院CAMHS入院史的个体这一风险为24.0%(OR = 13.3,95%可信区间:11.9 - 14.9),在青少年期(13 - 17岁)有住院CAMHS入院史的个体这一风险为36.5%(OR = 24.2,95%可信区间:21.2 - 27.6)。参加了CAMHS但未被诊断患有精神障碍的个体随后患精神病/双相情感障碍的风险与确实被诊断的个体一样高(OR = 0.9,99.5%可信区间:)。与其他CAMHS参与者相比,患精神病或双相情感障碍的个体更有可能最初在CAMHS被诊断为抑郁或其他情绪障碍(OR = 2.3,99.5%可信区间:1.6 - 3.0)和破坏性行为障碍(OR = 1.7,99.5%可信区间:1.2 - 2.5)。在28岁时所有的精神病/双相情感障碍诊断中,50.2%发生在那些在儿童期或青少年期的某个时候参加过CAMHS的个体中,这表明CAMHS不仅是预测精神病/双相情感障碍的高危系统,也是高能力系统。这些发现表明,在现有的专科CAMHS内,大规模精神病/双相情感障碍预测和预防研究具有巨大的、未被开发的潜力。