Seidl T, Chiari C
Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Klinikum Herford, Schwarzenmoorstr. 70, 32049, Herford, Deutschland.
Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich.
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2022 Oct;51(10):853-862. doi: 10.1007/s00132-022-04298-7. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
Since the first description of the ultrasound examination of the infant hip by Graf in 1980 this technique has impressively demonstrated that it lives up to its promise very well. In the implementation of hip ultrasound in the German pediatric guidelines it was hoped that it would improve the sensitivity and specificity of the early detection of dislocated and dysplastic joints in comparison to a general clinical hip screening. Furthermore, it has been repeatedly shown that general newborn hip ultrasound screening according to Graf can significantly reduce not only the treatment rate but also the invasiveness. Consequentially, the cost of treatment as well as the rate of late presenting developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) can also be significantly reduced. Despite those proven merits the meaningfulness of general hip ultrasound screening in infancy is still questioned, especially in the Anglo-American world. This article reviews how this misconception came about.
自1980年格拉夫首次描述婴儿髋关节超声检查以来,这项技术已令人印象深刻地证明它很好地兑现了承诺。在德国儿科指南中实施髋关节超声检查时,人们希望与一般的临床髋关节筛查相比,它能提高早期发现脱位和发育不良关节的敏感性和特异性。此外,多次表明,按照格拉夫方法进行的一般新生儿髋关节超声筛查不仅能显著降低治疗率,还能降低侵入性。相应地,治疗成本以及晚期出现的髋关节发育不良(DDH)发生率也能显著降低。尽管有这些已被证实的优点,但婴儿期一般髋关节超声筛查的意义仍受到质疑,尤其是在英美的医学界。本文回顾了这种误解是如何产生的。