Suppr超能文献

印度尼西亚需要住院治疗的急性发热病患者的菌血症特征。

The characteristics of bacteremia among patients with acute febrile illness requiring hospitalization in Indonesia.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia/ Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Indonesia Research Partnership on Infectious Disease (INA-RESPOND), Jakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 8;17(9):e0273414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273414. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Blood culturing remains the "gold standard" for bloodstream infection (BSI) diagnosis, but the method is inaccessible to many developing countries due to high costs and insufficient resources. To better understand the utility of blood cultures among patients in Indonesia, a country where blood cultures are not routinely performed, we evaluated data from a previous cohort study that included blood cultures for all participants. An acute febrile illness study was conducted from July 2013 to June 2016 at eight major hospitals in seven provincial capitals in Indonesia. All participants presented with a fever, and two-sided aerobic blood cultures were performed within 48 hours of hospital admission. Positive cultures were further assessed for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) patterns. Specimens from participants with negative culture results were screened by advanced molecular and serological methods for evidence of causal pathogens. Blood cultures were performed for 1,459 of 1,464 participants, and the 70.6% (1,030) participants that were negative by dengue NS1 antigen test were included in further analysis. Bacteremia was observed in 8.9% (92) participants, with the most frequent pathogens being Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (41) and Paratyphi A (10), Escherichia coli (14), and Staphylococcus aureus (10). Two S. Paratyphi A cases had evidence of AMR, and several E. coli cases were multidrug resistant (42.9%, 6/14) or monoresistant (14.3%, 2/14). Culture contamination was observed in 3.6% (37) cases. Molecular and serological assays identified etiological agents in participants having negative cultures, with 23.1% to 90% of cases being missed by blood cultures. Blood cultures are a valuable diagnostic tool for hospitalized patients presenting with fever. In Indonesia, pre-screening patients for the most common viral infections, such as dengue, influenza, and chikungunya viruses, would maximize the benefit to the patient while also conserving resources. Blood cultures should also be supplemented with advanced laboratory tests when available.

摘要

血培养仍然是血流感染(BSI)诊断的“金标准”,但由于成本高和资源不足,许多发展中国家无法采用这种方法。为了更好地了解印度尼西亚患者中血培养的应用情况,我们评估了一项之前的队列研究的数据,该研究对所有参与者都进行了血培养。2013 年 7 月至 2016 年 6 月,在印度尼西亚 7 个省会的 8 家大医院进行了一项急性发热疾病研究。所有参与者均出现发热,在入院后 48 小时内进行双侧需氧血培养。阳性培养物进一步评估了抗生素耐药(AMR)模式。对培养结果阴性的参与者的标本采用先进的分子和血清学方法进行因果病原体的筛选。对 1459 名 1464 名参与者中的 1459 名进行了血培养,对登革热 NS1 抗原检测阴性的 70.6%(1030 名)参与者进行了进一步分析。在 8.9%(92 名)参与者中观察到菌血症,最常见的病原体是伤寒沙门氏菌血清型 Typhi(41 名)和 Paratyphi A(10 名)、大肠杆菌(14 名)和金黄色葡萄球菌(10 名)。2 例 Paratyphi A 有 AMR 的证据,一些大肠杆菌病例是多药耐药(42.9%,6/14)或单药耐药(14.3%,2/14)。在 3.6%(37 名)病例中观察到培养污染。分子和血清学检测在培养阴性的参与者中鉴定出病因,90%的病例被血培养漏诊。血培养是住院发热患者的一种有价值的诊断工具。在印度尼西亚,对最常见的病毒感染(如登革热、流感和基孔肯雅热病毒)进行患者预筛查,可以最大限度地为患者带来益处,同时节约资源。当有条件时,血培养还应辅以先进的实验室检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e8/9455855/9407a3ea7528/pone.0273414.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验