Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russia.
J Chem Phys. 2022 Sep 7;157(9):094706. doi: 10.1063/5.0087363.
The present work attempts to systematically explore the surfactant sorption at liquid-liquid interfaces with coarse-grained models targeting thermodynamic properties of reference liquid solutions. We employ dissipative particle dynamics with soft-core forcefield tested against experimental data on micellization of surfactants in water, and the previous results are reproduced in this work. We consider three different nonionic surfactants: hexaethylene glycol monododecyl ether (CE), 2-[4-(2,4,4-trimethylpentan-2-yl)phenoxy]ethanol) known as Triton X-100 (TX-100), and two alkyl glucoside surfactants (CG) with n-alkane tail fragments and a saccharide hydrophilic head at decane-water and toluene-water interfaces. For TX-100, we composed a model based on the literature forcefield and found good agreement with the experimental critical micelle concentrations (CMCs). The head-head interactions are of different origins for different surfactant groups: entropic repulsion between ethylene oxide chains of CE and TX-100, and more chemically specific and complex interactions between the maltose heads of alkyl glucosides. We interpret our results with the Redlich-Peterson equation of monolayer adsorption in order to relate the adsorption to the bulk concentration of the surfactant and the interfacial tension. The densities of the adsorbed monolayer at CMC mostly agree with the experimental data, and a reasonable agreement was obtained for the interfacial tension at CMC. At the same time, we found significant discrepancies between the simulated and experimental adsorption isotherms. We explain them by the oversimplified forcefield: when the parameters are fitted to the free energies of bulk solutions, they may not correctly reproduce the interfacial free energies.
本工作旨在通过针对参考液相热力学性质的粗粒模型系统地研究表面活性剂在液-液界面上的吸附。我们采用耗散粒子动力学(Dissipative Particle Dynamics),并使用软核力场进行测试,以与表面活性剂在水中胶束化的实验数据进行对比,本工作中重现了先前的结果。我们考虑了三种不同的非离子表面活性剂:己烯乙二醇单十二醚(CE)、2-[4-(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)-2-苯氧基]乙醇(称为 Triton X-100(TX-100))和两种烷基糖苷表面活性剂(CG),它们的直链烷烃尾部片段和糖亲水头部位于癸烷-水和甲苯-水界面。对于 TX-100,我们基于文献中的力场构建了一个模型,并发现与实验临界胶束浓度(CMC)吻合良好。不同表面活性剂基团的头对头相互作用具有不同的起源:CE 和 TX-100 的乙氧基链之间的熵排斥,以及烷基糖苷的麦芽糖头部之间更具化学特异性和复杂的相互作用。我们使用单层吸附的 Redlich-Peterson 方程来解释我们的结果,以便将吸附与表面活性剂的体相浓度和界面张力联系起来。CMC 时吸附单层的密度与实验数据大多吻合良好,CMC 时界面张力也得到了合理的吻合。同时,我们发现模拟和实验吸附等温线之间存在显著差异。我们通过过于简化的力场来解释这些差异:当参数拟合到体相溶液的自由能时,它们可能无法正确再现界面自由能。