Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Nov 1;182:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.07.023. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
Assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function is essential in patient selection for transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) in secondary mitral regurgitation (MR). Although LV ejection fraction (EF) is mostly used for assessing LV function, it represents the change of LV chamber size, but not myocardial contractility. LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) provides an alternative to assess LV systolic function in patients with secondary MR. This study included 380 patients with secondary MR (mean age 71.0 ± 13.0 years; 61.1% male) who underwent TEER. Patients were dichotomized based on baseline LV GLS (more impaired GLS [<7.0%] vs less impaired GLS [≥7%]) based on existing literature. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, whereas the secondary outcome was the composite end point of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. The mean LV GLS was 8.1 ± 3.8%, and 162 patients had GLS <7%. Patients with more impaired GLS (<7%) were more likely to be male (68.5% vs 55.5%; p = 0.01) and have larger LV end-diastolic volume (110.5 ± 36.5 ml/m vs 92.9 ± 34.3 ml/m; p <0.001) and lower LVEF (22.2 ± 8.9% vs 36.4 ± 14.5%; p <0.001) than those with less impaired GLS (≥7%). The number of clips used and residual MR were similar between the 2 groups. Patients with more impaired LV GLS (<7%) had significantly higher 2-year event rates of the primary outcome (38.2% vs 25.9%; log-rank p = 0.003) and the secondary outcome (52.5% vs 36.3%; log-rank p <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that LV GLS (<7%) was independently associated with the primary outcome (hazard ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 2.34, p = 0.005) and the secondary outcome (hazard ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 2.20, p = 0.016) whereas such associations were not observed with LVEF. In conclusion, LV GLS (<7%) was independently associated with a higher risk of adverse events in patients with secondary MR who underwent TEER.
左心室(LV)收缩功能评估对于接受经导管缘对缘修复(TEER)治疗的继发性二尖瓣反流(MR)患者的选择至关重要。尽管 LV 射血分数(EF)主要用于评估 LV 功能,但它反映的是 LV 腔室大小的变化,而不是心肌收缩力。LV 整体纵向应变(GLS)为评估继发性 MR 患者的 LV 收缩功能提供了一种替代方法。这项研究纳入了 380 名接受 TEER 治疗的继发性 MR 患者(平均年龄 71.0 ± 13.0 岁;61.1%为男性)。根据现有文献,基于基线 LV GLS(更严重的 GLS [<7.0%]与较轻的 GLS [≥7%])将患者分为两组。主要结局是全因死亡率,次要结局是全因死亡率和心力衰竭住院的复合终点。平均 LV GLS 为 8.1 ± 3.8%,162 名患者的 GLS<7%。GLS 更严重的患者(<7%)更可能为男性(68.5%比 55.5%;p=0.01),LV 舒张末期容积更大(110.5 ± 36.5 ml/m 比 92.9 ± 34.3 ml/m;p<0.001),LVEF 更低(22.2 ± 8.9%比 36.4 ± 14.5%;p<0.001)。两组间使用的夹子数量和残余 MR 相似。GLS 更严重的 LV(<7%)患者的主要结局(38.2%比 25.9%;log-rank p=0.003)和次要结局(52.5%比 36.3%;log-rank p<0.001)的 2 年事件发生率明显更高。多变量分析显示,LV GLS(<7%)与主要结局(风险比 1.65,95%置信区间 1.16 至 2.34,p=0.005)和次要结局(风险比 1.54,95%置信区间 1.08 至 2.20,p=0.016)独立相关,而 LVEF 则没有这种相关性。结论:在接受 TEER 治疗的继发性 MR 患者中,LV GLS(<7%)与不良事件风险增加独立相关。