Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Bioinformatics Center of Expertise, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 25;75(7):750-758. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.024.
Left ventricular (LV) systolic function may be overestimated in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) when using LV ejection fraction (EF). LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a less load-dependent measure of LV function. However, the prognostic value of LV GLS in secondary MR has not been evaluated.
This study sought to demonstrate the prognostic value of LV GLS over LVEF in patients with secondary MR.
A total of 650 patients (mean 66 ± 11 years of age, 68% men) with significant secondary MR were included. The study population was subdivided based on the LV GLS value at which the hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was >1 using a spline curve analysis (LV GLS <7.0%, impaired LV systolic function vs. LV GLS ≥7.0%, preserved LV systolic function). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.
During a median follow-up of 56 (interquartile range: 28 to 106 months) months, 334 (51%) patients died. Patients with a more impaired LV GLS showed significantly higher mortality rates at 1-, 2-, and 5-year follow-up (13%, 23%, and 44%, respectively) when compared with patients with more preserved LV systolic function (5%, 14%, and 31%, respectively). On multivariable analysis, LV GLS <7.0% was associated with increased mortality (HR: 1.337; 95% confidence interval: 1.038 to 1.722; p = 0.024), whereas LVEF ≤30% was not (HR: 1.055; 95% confidence interval: 0.794 to 1.403; p = 0.711).
In patients with secondary MR, impaired LV GLS was independently associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality, whereas LVEF was not. LV GLS may therefore be useful in the risk stratification of patients with secondary MR.
当使用左心室射血分数(LVEF)时,继发性二尖瓣反流(MR)患者的左心室收缩功能可能被高估。左心室整体纵向应变(GLS)是一种较少依赖负荷的左心室功能测量方法。然而,GLS 在继发性 MR 中的预后价值尚未得到评估。
本研究旨在证明继发性 MR 患者中,GLS 比 LVEF 更能预测预后。
共纳入 650 例(平均年龄 66±11 岁,68%为男性)有明显继发性 MR 的患者。根据样条曲线分析,将 LVEF 预测全因死亡率的 HR>1 时的左心室 GLS 值(LV GLS<7.0%,左心室收缩功能受损与 LV GLS≥7.0%,左心室收缩功能正常)进行分组。主要终点是全因死亡率。
在中位数为 56(四分位间距:28 至 106 个月)个月的随访期间,334 例(51%)患者死亡。与左心室收缩功能正常的患者相比,左心室 GLS 受损更严重的患者在 1 年、2 年和 5 年随访时的死亡率明显更高(分别为 13%、23%和 44%),而左心室收缩功能正常的患者分别为 5%、14%和 31%)。多变量分析显示,LV GLS<7.0%与死亡率增加相关(HR:1.337;95%置信区间:1.038 至 1.722;p=0.024),而 LVEF≤30%则不相关(HR:1.055;95%置信区间:0.794 至 1.403;p=0.711)。
在继发性 MR 患者中,左心室 GLS 受损与全因死亡率增加独立相关,而 LVEF 则不相关。因此,GLS 可能对继发性 MR 患者的危险分层有用。