Lane P, Vichi P, Bain D L, Tritton T R
Cancer Res. 1987 Aug 1;47(15):4038-42.
In order to learn whether a direct relationship exists between cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of Adriamycin, we have compared the temperature dependencies of these two processes in L1210 cells. We find that the equilibrium concentration of drug taken inside the cells varies smoothly with temperature between 37 degrees C and 0 degree C. Even at 0 degree C, however, there is still measurable uptake of the drug into cells. The cytotoxicity index (cloning in soft agar), on the other hand, does not parallel the uptake temperature dependence. Cytotoxicity rapidly diminishes as the temperature of drug exposure is lowered; at all temperatures below about 20 degrees C, Adriamycin is not active. In contrast, other cytotoxic anticancer drugs like mitomycin C, bleomycin, and ARK 73-21 (a platinum analogue) retain cytotoxic potency at low temperatures. The inability of Adriamycin to kill cells at low temperature persists even at very high drug concentrations where substantial quantities of drug enter the cells. The low temperature impotence is not a result of inoperative enzymes which could metabolize Adriamycin to an alkylating species or electron donor to oxygen, since NADH and NADPH dependent reductase activities show linear Arrhenius behavior with no indication of low temperature inactivity. Using purified L1210 plasma membranes with bound Adriamycin as a fluorescence polarization probe, we find evidence of a phase change in the cell surface occurring at the same temperature as the loss of biological activity (approximately equal to 20 degrees C). We conclude that Adriamycin induced cytotoxicity is not dictated solely by uptake, in apparent contradiction with mechanisms requiring an intracellular target. Moreover, the loss of cytotoxicity below 20 degrees C appears to be linked to a structural change in the cell surface membrane, supporting a role other than transport for this membrane in transducing Adriamycin action.
为了了解阿霉素的细胞摄取与细胞毒性之间是否存在直接关系,我们比较了L1210细胞中这两个过程对温度的依赖性。我们发现,细胞内摄取的药物平衡浓度在37℃至0℃之间随温度平稳变化。然而,即使在0℃时,仍有可测量的药物摄取进入细胞。另一方面,细胞毒性指数(软琼脂克隆)与摄取温度依赖性并不平行。随着药物暴露温度降低,细胞毒性迅速减弱;在所有低于约20℃的温度下,阿霉素均无活性。相比之下,其他细胞毒性抗癌药物如丝裂霉素C、博来霉素和ARK 73 - 21(一种铂类似物)在低温下仍保留细胞毒性效力。即使在药物大量进入细胞的非常高的药物浓度下,阿霉素在低温下杀死细胞的能力仍然缺失。低温无活性并非由于能够将阿霉素代谢为烷基化物质或氧电子供体的酶不起作用,因为依赖NADH和NADPH的还原酶活性呈现线性阿伦尼乌斯行为,没有低温无活性的迹象。使用结合有阿霉素的纯化L1210质膜作为荧光偏振探针,我们发现细胞表面在与生物活性丧失相同的温度(约等于20℃)发生相变的证据。我们得出结论,阿霉素诱导的细胞毒性并非仅由摄取决定,这显然与需要细胞内靶点的机制相矛盾。此外,低于20℃时细胞毒性的丧失似乎与细胞表面膜的结构变化有关,支持了该膜在转导阿霉素作用中除运输之外的其他作用。