Bae Bong Kyung, Yang Kyungmi, Noh Jae Myung, Pyo Hongryull, Ahn Yong Chan
Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 27;14(17):4152. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174152.
We aimed to report the clinical outcomes following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using photon or proton equipment in early-stage lung cancer. We retrospectively reviewed 202 cT1-2N0M0 lung cancer patients who underwent SBRT with 60 Gy in four consecutive fractions between 2010 and 2019 at our institution: 168 photon SBRT and 34 proton SBRT. Patients who underwent proton SBRT had relatively poor baseline lung condition compared to those who underwent photon SBRT. Clinical outcomes were comparable between treatment modalities: 5-year local control (90.8% vs. 83.6%, = 0.602); progression-free survival (61.6% vs. 57.8%, = 0.370); overall survival (51.7% vs. 51.9%, = 0.475); and cause-specific survival (70.3% vs. 62.6%, = 0.618). There was no statistically significant difference in grade ≥ 2 toxicities: radiation pneumonitis (19.6% vs. 26.4%, = 0.371); musculoskeletal (13.7% vs. 5.9%, = 0.264); and skin (3.6% vs. 0.0%, = 0.604). In the binary logistic regression analysis of grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis, poor performance status and poor baseline diffusion capacity of lung for carbon monoxide were significant. To summarize, though patients with high risk of developing lung toxicity underwent proton SBRT more frequently, the SBRT techniques resulted in comparable oncologic outcomes with similar toxicity profiles. Proton SBRT could be considered for patients at high risk of radiation pneumonitis.
我们旨在报告早期肺癌患者使用光子或质子设备进行立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)后的临床结果。我们回顾性分析了2010年至2019年期间在我院接受连续4次分割、每次60 Gy的SBRT治疗的202例cT1-2N0M0肺癌患者:168例接受光子SBRT,34例接受质子SBRT。与接受光子SBRT的患者相比,接受质子SBRT的患者基线肺部状况相对较差。两种治疗方式的临床结果具有可比性:5年局部控制率(90.8%对83.6%,P = 0.602);无进展生存期(61.6%对57.8%,P = 0.370);总生存期(51.7%对51.9%,P = 0.475);以及特定病因生存期(70.3%对62.6%,P = 0.618)。≥2级毒性反应无统计学显著差异:放射性肺炎(19.6%对26.4%,P = 0.371);肌肉骨骼(13.7%对5.9%,P = 0.264);以及皮肤(3.6%对0.0%,P = 0.604)。在≥3级放射性肺炎的二元逻辑回归分析中,体能状态差和基线一氧化碳肺弥散能力差具有显著性。总之,尽管发生肺部毒性高风险的患者更频繁地接受质子SBRT,但SBRT技术导致了具有相似毒性特征的可比肿瘤学结果。对于放射性肺炎高风险患者可考虑质子SBRT。