Böcking Alfred, Friedrich David, Schramm Martin, Palcic Branko, Erbeznik Gregor
Institute of Cytopathology, University Clinics, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
AstraZeneca, 80636 München, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 30;14(17):4210. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174210.
Background: Microscopical screening of cytological samples for the presence of cancer cells at high throughput with sufficient diagnostic accuracy requires highly specialized personnel which is not available in most countries. Methods: Using commercially available automated microscope-based screeners (MotiCyte and EasyScan), software was developed which is able to classify Feulgen-stained nuclei into eight diagnostically relevant types, using supervised machine learning. the nuclei belonging to normal cells were used for internal calibration of the nuclear DNA content while nuclei belonging to those suspicious of being malignant were specifically identified. The percentage of morphologically abnormal nuclei was used to identify samples suspected of malignancy, and the proof of DNA-aneuploidy was used to definitely determine the state malignancy. A blinded study was performed using oral smears from 92 patients with Fanconi anemia, revealing oral leukoplakias or erythroplakias. In an earlier study, we compared diagnostic accuracies on 121 serous effusion specimens. In addition, using a blinded study employing 80 patients with prostate cancer who were under active surveillance, we aimed to identify those whose cancers would not advance within 4 years. Results: Applying a threshold of the presence of >4% of morphologically abnormal nuclei from oral squamous cells and DNA single-cell or stemline aneuploidy to identify samples suspected of malignancy, an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91.3% was found as compared with 75.0% accuracy determined by conventional subjective cytological assessment using the same slides. Accuracy of automated screening effusions was 84.3% as compared to 95.9% of conventional cytology. No prostate cancer patients under active surveillance, revealing DNA-grade 1, showed progress of their disease within 4.1 years. Conclusions: An automated microscope-based screener was developed which is able to identify malignant cells in different types of human specimens with a diagnostic accuracy comparable with subjective cytological assessment. Early prostate cancers which do not progress despite applying any therapy could be identified using this automated approach.
要以高通量且具备足够诊断准确性对细胞学样本进行癌细胞的显微镜筛查,需要高度专业的人员,而大多数国家都没有这样的人员。方法:利用市售的基于自动显微镜的筛查仪(MotiCyte和EasyScan),开发了一种软件,该软件能够使用监督式机器学习将福尔根染色的细胞核分类为八种与诊断相关的类型。属于正常细胞的细胞核用于核DNA含量的内部校准,而属于疑似恶性细胞的细胞核则被专门识别出来。形态异常细胞核的百分比用于识别疑似恶性的样本,DNA非整倍体的证据用于明确确定恶性状态。使用92例范可尼贫血患者的口腔涂片进行了一项盲法研究,这些患者患有口腔白斑或红斑。在一项早期研究中,我们比较了121份浆液性积液标本的诊断准确性。此外,通过对80例接受主动监测的前列腺癌患者进行盲法研究,我们旨在识别那些癌症在4年内不会进展的患者。结果:应用口腔鳞状细胞中形态异常细胞核>4%以及DNA单细胞或干系非整倍体的存在阈值来识别疑似恶性的样本,发现总体诊断准确性为91.3%,而使用相同玻片通过传统主观细胞学评估确定的准确性为75.0%。自动筛查积液的准确性为84.3%,而传统细胞学的准确性为95.9%。在接受主动监测且显示DNA 1级的前列腺癌患者中,没有患者在4.1年内出现疾病进展。结论:开发了一种基于自动显微镜的筛查仪,它能够在不同类型的人体标本中识别恶性细胞,其诊断准确性与主观细胞学评估相当。使用这种自动化方法可以识别出即使不进行任何治疗也不会进展的早期前列腺癌。