Hettler Madelaine, Kitz Julia, Seif Amir Hosseini Ali, Guhlich Manuel, Panahi Babak, Ernst Jennifer, Conradi Lena-Christin, Ghadimi Michael, Ströbel Philipp, Jakob Jens
Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 5;14(17):4331. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174331.
Histological subtype and grading are cornerstones of treatment decisions in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Due to intratumoral heterogeneity, pretreatment grading assessment is frequently unreliable and may be improved through functional imaging. In this pilot study, 12 patients with histologically confirmed STS were included. Preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging was fused with a computed tomography scan of the resected specimen after collecting core needle biopsies and placing radiopaque markers at distinct tumor sites. The Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) grading criteria of the biopsies and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of the biopsy sites were correlated. Concordance in grading between the specimen and at least one biopsy was achieved in 9 of 11 cases (81.8%). In 7 of 12 cases, fusion imaging was feasible without relevant contour deviation. Functional analysis revealed a tendency for high-grade regions (Grade 2/3 (G2/G3)) (median (range) ± standard deviation: 1.13 (0.78-1.70) ± 0.23 × 10 mm/s) to have lower ADC values than low-grade regions (G1; 1.43 (0.64-2.03) ± 0.46 × 10 mm/s). In addition, FNCLCC scoring of multiple tumor biopsies proved intratumoral heterogeneity as expected. The ADC appears to correlate with the FNCLCC grading criteria. Further studies are needed to determine whether functional imaging may supplement histopathological grading.
组织学亚型和分级是软组织肉瘤(STS)治疗决策的基石。由于肿瘤内异质性,术前分级评估常常不可靠,而功能成像可能会改善这一情况。在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了12例经组织学确诊的STS患者。在采集粗针活检组织并在不同肿瘤部位放置不透射线标记物后,将术前功能磁共振成像与切除标本的计算机断层扫描进行融合。对活检组织的法国国立癌症中心联合会(FNCLCC)分级标准与活检部位的表观扩散系数(ADC)进行相关性分析。11例中有9例(81.8%)标本与至少一次活检的分级一致。12例中有7例,融合成像可行且无相关轮廓偏差。功能分析显示,高级别区域(2/3级(G2/G3))(中位数(范围)±标准差:1.13(0.78 - 1.70)±0.23×10⁻³mm²/s)的ADC值往往低于低级别区域(G1;1.43(0.64 - 2.03)±0.46×10⁻³mm²/s)。此外,对多个肿瘤活检组织进行FNCLCC评分证实了肿瘤内存在预期的异质性。ADC似乎与FNCLCC分级标准相关。需要进一步研究以确定功能成像是否可补充组织病理学分级。