College of Economics, Xi'an University of Finance and Economics, Xi'an 710100, China.
Center for Experimental Economics in Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 1;19(17):10923. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710923.
Although eyeglasses have been considered a cost-effective way to combat myopia, the empirical evidence of its impacts on improving learning outcomes is inconsistent. This paper provides empirical evidence examining the effect of providing eyeglasses on academic performance between provinces with a different economic level in western China. Overall, we find a significant impact in Intention-to-Treat analysis and a large and significant local average treatment effect of providing free eyeglasses to students in the poor province but not in the other. The difference in impact between the two provinces is not a matter of experimental design, implementation, or partial compliance. Instead, we find that the lack of impact in the wealthier provinces is mainly due to less blackboard usage in class and wealthier households. Our study found that providing free eyeglasses to disadvantaged groups boosted their academic performance more than to their counterparts.
尽管眼镜被认为是一种具有成本效益的控制近视的方法,但其实证证据对于提高学习成果的影响并不一致。本文提供了实证证据,考察了在中国西部经济水平不同的省份提供眼镜对学习成绩的影响。总体而言,我们在意向性治疗分析中发现了显著的影响,并且在为贫困省份的学生提供免费眼镜方面产生了显著而大的局部平均治疗效果,但在另一个省份则没有。这两个省份之间的影响差异并不是实验设计、实施或部分遵守的问题。相反,我们发现,在较富裕的省份没有产生影响的主要原因是课堂上使用黑板的频率较低,以及富裕家庭的存在。我们的研究发现,为弱势群体提供免费眼镜可以提高他们的学习成绩,效果比为同龄人提供的要好。