Dhirar Nonita, Dudeja Sankalp, Duggal Mona, Gupta Parul Chawla, Jaiswal Nishant, Singh Meenu, Ram Jagat
Department of Community Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Pediatrics, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01345-9.
Primary objective of this review was to measure compliance with spectacle use in children with refractive errors. Secondary objective was to understand the reasons for non-compliance.
The databases searched were Ovid, EMBASE, CINAHL and Pubmed. All studies up to March, 2018 were included. The search terms were- ((((((Compliance [Title/Abstract]) OR Adherence [Title/Abstract]) OR Compliant [Title/Abstract]) OR Adherent [Title/Abstract])) AND (((Spectacle [Title/Abstract]) OR Spectacles [Title/Abstract]) OR Eye Glasses [Title/Abstract])) AND ((((Child [Title/Abstract]) OR Children [Title/Abstract]) OR Adolescent [Title/Abstract]) OR Adolescents [Title/Abstract]). Two researchers independently searched the databases and initial screening obtained 33 articles. The PRISMA guidelines were followed for conducting and writing the systematic review. Two reviewers assessed data quality independently using the Quality Assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO). Poor quality studies were those, which had a score of less than 33% on the QATSO tool. Sensitivity analysis was done to determine if poor quality studies effected compliance. Galbraith plot was used to investigate statistical heterogeneity amongst studies. A random effects model was used to pool compliance.
Twenty-three studies were included in the review, of which 20 were included in the quantitative analysis. All the studies were cross sectional. The overall compliance with spectacle use was 40.14% (95% CI- 32.78-47.50). The compliance varied from 9.84% (95% CI = 2.36-17.31) to 78.57% (95% CI = 68.96-88.18). The compliance derived in sensitivity analysis was 40.09%. Reasons for non-compliance were broken/lost spectacles, forgetfulness, and parental disapproval.
Appropriate remedial measures such as health education and strengthening vision care services will be required to address poor compliance with spectacle use among children.
本综述的主要目的是衡量屈光不正儿童佩戴眼镜的依从性。次要目的是了解不依从的原因。
检索的数据库有Ovid、EMBASE、CINAHL和Pubmed。纳入截至2018年3月的所有研究。检索词为 - ((((("依从性" [标题/摘要]) 或 "坚持性" [标题/摘要]) 或 "依从的" [标题/摘要]) 或 "坚持的" [标题/摘要])) 且 ((((("眼镜" [标题/摘要]) 或 "眼镜" [标题/摘要]) 或 "眼镜" [标题/摘要])) 且 ((((("儿童" [标题/摘要]) 或 "儿童" [标题/摘要]) 或 "青少年" [标题/摘要]) 或 "青少年" [标题/摘要]))。两名研究人员独立检索数据库,初步筛选得到33篇文章。遵循PRISMA指南进行和撰写系统综述。两名评审员使用观察性研究系统综述质量评估工具(QATSO)独立评估数据质量。质量差的研究是指在QATSO工具上得分低于33%的研究。进行敏感性分析以确定质量差的研究是否影响依从性。使用加尔布雷思图调查研究之间的统计异质性。采用随机效应模型汇总依从性。
本综述纳入23项研究,其中20项纳入定量分析。所有研究均为横断面研究。佩戴眼镜的总体依从性为40.14%(95%可信区间 - 32.78 - 47.50)。依从性从9.84%(95%可信区间 = 2.36 - 17.31)到78.57%(95%可信区间 = 68.96 - 88.18)不等。敏感性分析得出的依从性为40.09%。不依从的原因是眼镜损坏/丢失、遗忘和家长不赞成。
需要采取适当的补救措施,如健康教育和加强视力保健服务,以解决儿童佩戴眼镜依从性差的问题。