• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙贡河流域不同荒漠群落细根对土壤有机碳积累的贡献

Contribution of Fine Roots to Soil Organic Carbon Accumulation in Different Desert Communities in the Sangong River Basin.

机构信息

College of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.

State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 1;19(17):10936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710936.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph191710936
PMID:36078644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9518483/
Abstract

This study explored the relationship between soil organic carbon (SOC) and root distribution, with the aim of evaluating the carbon stocks and sequestration potential under five plant communities (, , , , and ) in an arid region, the Sangong River watershed desert ecosystem. Root biomass, ecological factors, and SOC in different layers of a 0-100 cm soil profile were investigated. The results demonstrated that almost all living fine root biomass (11.78-34.41 g/m) and dead fine root biomass (5.64-15.45 g/m) levels were highest in the 10-20 cm layer, except for the community, which showed the highest living and dead fine root biomass at a depth of 60-70 cm. Fine root biomass showed strong seasonal dynamics in the five communities from June to October. The biomass levels of the (138.31 g/m) and (229.73 g/m) communities were highest in August, whereas those of the (87.76 g/m), (66.29 g/m), and (148.31 g/m) communities were highest in September. The SOC of the five communities displayed strong changes with increasing soil depth. The mean SOC value across all five communities was 77.36% at 0-30 cm. The highest SOC values of the (3.08 g/kg), (2.35 g/kg), and (2.34 g/kg) communities were found in June, and the highest value of the (2.25 and 2.31 g/kg, > 0.05) community was found in June and September. The highest SOC values of the (1.88 g/kg) community were found in July. Fine root production and turnover rate were 50.67-486.92 g/m/year and 1.25-1.98 times per year. The relationships among SOC, fine root biomass, and ecological factors (soil water content and soil bulk density) were significant for all five communities. Based on the results, higher soil water content and soil conductivity favored the decomposition of root litter and increased fine root turnover, thereby facilitating SOC formation. Higher pH and bulk density levels are not conducive to soil biological activity and SOC mineralization, leading to increased SOC levels in desert regions.

摘要

本研究探讨了土壤有机碳(SOC)与根系分布之间的关系,旨在评估在干旱地区(三工河流域沙漠生态系统)的五个植物群落(,,,,和)下的碳储量和固碳潜力。研究了不同土层 0-100cm 土壤剖面中的根系生物量、生态因子和 SOC。结果表明,除了 群落外,几乎所有活细根生物量(11.78-34.41g/m)和死细根生物量(5.64-15.45g/m)水平都在 10-20cm 层最高,而 群落则在 60-70cm 深处表现出最高的活细根和死细根生物量。五个群落的细根生物量在 6 月至 10 月之间具有强烈的季节性动态。8 月时,群落(138.31g/m)和群落(229.73g/m)的生物量水平最高,而群落(87.76g/m)、群落(66.29g/m)和群落(148.31g/m)的生物量水平则在 9 月最高。五个群落的 SOC 随土壤深度的增加而发生强烈变化。五个群落的平均 SOC 值在 0-30cm 处为 77.36%。群落(3.08g/kg)、(2.35g/kg)和(2.34g/kg)的 SOC 值最高,均出现在 6 月,而群落(2.25 和 2.31g/kg,>0.05)的 SOC 值最高则出现在 6 月和 9 月。群落(1.88g/kg)的 SOC 值最高出现在 7 月。细根生产力和周转率分别为 50.67-486.92g/m/year 和 1.25-1.98 次/年。SOC、细根生物量和生态因子(土壤含水量和土壤容重)之间的关系对所有五个群落都具有重要意义。基于这些结果,较高的土壤含水量和土壤电导率有利于根屑的分解和细根周转率的提高,从而促进 SOC 的形成。较高的 pH 值和容重水平不利于土壤生物活性和 SOC 矿化,导致沙漠地区 SOC 水平升高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7034/9518483/013aaeced924/ijerph-19-10936-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7034/9518483/ca2c87a8ebc2/ijerph-19-10936-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7034/9518483/6622eb53ba01/ijerph-19-10936-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7034/9518483/af69a92a7bf7/ijerph-19-10936-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7034/9518483/3f41670a91e0/ijerph-19-10936-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7034/9518483/3c3aedd0c546/ijerph-19-10936-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7034/9518483/013aaeced924/ijerph-19-10936-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7034/9518483/ca2c87a8ebc2/ijerph-19-10936-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7034/9518483/6622eb53ba01/ijerph-19-10936-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7034/9518483/af69a92a7bf7/ijerph-19-10936-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7034/9518483/3f41670a91e0/ijerph-19-10936-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7034/9518483/3c3aedd0c546/ijerph-19-10936-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7034/9518483/013aaeced924/ijerph-19-10936-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Contribution of Fine Roots to Soil Organic Carbon Accumulation in Different Desert Communities in the Sangong River Basin.沙贡河流域不同荒漠群落细根对土壤有机碳积累的贡献
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 1;19(17):10936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710936.
2
Patterns of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry of three life-form desert plants and responses to soil and microbial biomass factors in a hyper-arid desert ecosystem.极端干旱沙漠生态系统中三种生活型荒漠植物的碳、氮、磷化学计量特征及其对土壤和微生物生物量因子的响应
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):43962-43974. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25445-3. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
3
Soil aggregation and aggregate-associated carbon under four typical halophyte communities in an arid area.干旱地区四种典型盐生植物群落下的土壤团聚体及团聚体相关碳
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Dec;23(23):23920-23929. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7583-3. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
4
Comparing soil organic carbon dynamics in perennial grasses and shrubs in a saline-alkaline arid region, northwestern China.比较中国西北地区盐碱性干旱地区多年生草本植物和灌木的土壤有机碳动态。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042927. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
5
[Spatial distribution patterns of soil organic carbon under Elacagnus angustifolia--Achnatherum splendens community in an arid area of Northwest China].[中国西北干旱区沙棘-芨芨草群落土壤有机碳空间分布格局]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2013 Oct;24(10):2725-30.
6
Variation in Root-Associated Microbial Communities among Three Different Plant Species in Natural Desert Ecosystem.自然沙漠生态系统中三种不同植物物种根系相关微生物群落的差异
Plants (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;13(17):2468. doi: 10.3390/plants13172468.
7
Fine root dynamics and its contribution to soil organic carbon stocks with plantation development in alpine sandy land.高寒沙地人工林发育过程中细根动态及其对土壤有机碳储量的贡献
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Mar 9;14:1093678. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1093678. eCollection 2023.
8
Soil organic carbon of degraded wetlands treated with freshwater in the Yellow River Delta, China.黄河三角洲退化湿地经淡水处理后的土壤有机碳。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;92(10):2628-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.030. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
9
[Changes of Soil Organic Carbon and Its Influencing Factors of Apple Orchards and Black Locusts in the Small Watershed of Loess Plateau, China].[中国黄土高原小流域苹果园和刺槐林土壤有机碳变化及其影响因素]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2015 Jul;36(7):2662-8.
10
[Differences in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen and their impact factors under different restoration patterns in the Loess Plateau.].黄土高原不同恢复模式下土壤有机碳和全氮差异及其影响因素
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 Mar;27(3):716-722. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201603.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Fine root decomposition in forest ecosystems: an ecological perspective.森林生态系统中的细根分解:生态学视角
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Oct 27;14:1277510. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1277510. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Responses of Fine Roots at Different Soil Depths to Different Thinning Intensities in a Secondary Forest in the Qinling Mountains, China.中国秦岭山地次生林不同土壤深度细根对不同间伐强度的响应
Biology (Basel). 2022 Feb 22;11(3):351. doi: 10.3390/biology11030351.
2
Root effects on soil organic carbon: a double-edged sword.根系对土壤有机碳的影响:一把双刃剑。
New Phytol. 2021 Apr;230(1):60-65. doi: 10.1111/nph.17082. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
3
Contrasting dynamics and trait controls in first-order root compared with leaf litter decomposition.
一级根系与叶凋落物分解的动态和性状控制的对比。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 9;115(41):10392-10397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716595115. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
4
Evidence for the primacy of living root inputs, not root or shoot litter, in forming soil organic carbon.活根输入而非根或枝凋落物在形成土壤有机碳中起主导作用的证据。
New Phytol. 2019 Jan;221(1):233-246. doi: 10.1111/nph.15361. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
5
Rooting strategies in a subtropical savanna: a landscape-scale three-dimensional assessment.亚热带稀树草原的根系策略:一项景观尺度的三维评估
Oecologia. 2018 Apr;186(4):1127-1135. doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4083-9. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
6
Global Sequestration Potential of Increased Organic Carbon in Cropland Soils.增加农田土壤有机碳的全球封存潜力。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 14;7(1):15554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15794-8.
7
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes.陆地生物群落根系分布的全球分析。
Oecologia. 1996 Nov;108(3):389-411. doi: 10.1007/BF00333714.
8
The sensitivity of soil respiration to soil temperature, moisture, and carbon supply at the global scale.全球尺度土壤呼吸对土壤温度、湿度和碳供应的敏感性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 May;23(5):2090-2103. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13489. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
9
Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes.重新定义细根可提高对地下贡献陆地生物圈过程的理解。
New Phytol. 2015 Aug;207(3):505-18. doi: 10.1111/nph.13363. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
10
Global covariation of carbon turnover times with climate in terrestrial ecosystems.陆地生态系统中碳周转时间与气候的全球协同变化。
Nature. 2014 Oct 9;514(7521):213-7. doi: 10.1038/nature13731. Epub 2014 Sep 24.