• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农地流转、社会保障与农户生产性投资——基于中国 CFPS 调查数据

Farmland Transfer, Social Security, and Households' Productive Investment: Based on China's CFPS Survey.

机构信息

School of Public Administration, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.

Institute of Natural Resource Governance, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 4;19(17):11082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711082.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph191711082
PMID:36078796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9518441/
Abstract

The willingness of farmers to transfer land on a big scale will be impacted when the rural social security system is not ideal, which will limit households' productive investment. This paper investigated the intermediate effects of social security on farmland transfer and productive investment by using zero-inflated models based on 4703 samples across China. Here are the findings: (1) Farmland transfer does not significantly impact productive investment without considering social society. (2) With the improvement in social security, farmland transfer significantly affects fixed investment but is not the same as households' current investment. (3) Under the social security constraints, there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between farmland transfer and current investment. (4) The partial effect of farmland transfer on fixed investment is significantly positive, and it shows a trend of rising volatility. The government should re-examine the expected effects of the farmland transfer policy and focus on the farmers' worries about the future. Meanwhile, it is necessary to comprehensively improve the social security system and improve the multi-dimensional survival ability of farmers to give full play to the critical role of farmland transfer in current investment.

摘要

当农村社会保障体系不完善时,农民大规模转让土地的意愿将会受到影响,这将限制农户的生产性投资。本文利用中国 4703 个样本的零膨胀模型,探讨了社会保障对农地流转和生产性投资的中介效应。研究结果表明:(1)在不考虑社会保障的情况下,农地流转对生产性投资没有显著影响。(2)随着社会保障水平的提高,农地流转对固定资产投资有显著影响,但与农户的当前投资不同。(3)在社会保障的约束下,农地流转与当前投资之间存在着倒“U”型关系。(4)农地流转对固定资产投资的部分效应显著为正,且呈现出波动性上升的趋势。政府应重新审视农地流转政策的预期效果,关注农民对未来的担忧。同时,有必要全面完善社会保障体系,提高农民的多维生存能力,充分发挥农地流转对当前投资的关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1107/9518441/6c651f37d789/ijerph-19-11082-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1107/9518441/6c651f37d789/ijerph-19-11082-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1107/9518441/6c651f37d789/ijerph-19-11082-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Farmland Transfer, Social Security, and Households' Productive Investment: Based on China's CFPS Survey.农地流转、社会保障与农户生产性投资——基于中国 CFPS 调查数据
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 4;19(17):11082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711082.
2
Exploring the Role of Land Transfer and Social Capital in Improving Agricultural Income under the Background of Rural Revitalization.探讨农村振兴背景下土地流转和社会资本对提高农业收入的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;19(24):17077. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417077.
3
Social capital, government guidance and contract choice in agricultural land transfer.社会资本、政府引导与农地流转中的契约选择
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0303392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303392. eCollection 2024.
4
A study on the mode choice of large-scale households' farmland transfer-in in rural China: Based on the economic analysis paradigm of transaction costs.基于交易成本经济学分析范式的中国农村大规模农户耕地转入模式选择研究
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 17;18(10):e0287022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287022. eCollection 2023.
5
Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of agricultural land transfer in China.中国农地流转的时空演变及其驱动因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0310532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310532. eCollection 2024.
6
How do farmland rental markets affect farmers' income? Evidence from a matched renting-in and renting-out household survey in Northeast China.耕地租赁市场如何影响农民收入?来自中国东北地区租入和租出农户匹配调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 30;16(9):e0256590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256590. eCollection 2021.
7
Influence of farmland confirmation on farmland abandonment in China.耕地确认对中国耕地撂荒的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 May 4;18(5):e0285174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285174. eCollection 2023.
8
Non-Farm Employment, Farmland Renting and Farming Ability: Evidence from China.非农就业、农地租赁与务农能力:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 30;19(9):5476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095476.
9
Farmland abandonment and its determinants in the different ecological villages of the Koshi river basin, central Himalayas: Synergy of high-resolution remote sensing and social surveys.喜马拉雅山脉中部克什河流域不同生态村的农田弃耕及其决定因素:高分辨率遥感和社会调查的协同作用。
Environ Res. 2020 Sep;188:109711. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109711. Epub 2020 May 31.
10
How livelihood capital affects farmers' willingness to pay for farmland non-market value? Evidence from Jianghan Plain, China.生计资本如何影响农民对农地非市场价值的支付意愿?来自中国江汉平原的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(34):51456-51468. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19327-3. Epub 2022 Mar 4.