Suppr超能文献

体重很重要——急诊科使用维纳卡兰或伊布利特进行心脏复律

Body Weight Counts-Cardioversion with Vernakalant or Ibutilide at the Emergency Department.

作者信息

Lindmayr Teresa, Schnaubelt Sebastian, Sulzgruber Patrick, Simon Alexander, Niederdoeckl Jan, Cacioppo Filippo, Schuetz Nikola, Domanovits Hans, Spiel Alexander Oskar

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Clinic Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 28;11(17):5061. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175061.

Abstract

AIM

Medication for the pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) is applied either in a fixed dose or adapted to body weight. Individual body weight might be a relevant confounder for anti-arrhythmic treatment success. Therefore, the aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of body weight on pharmacological cardioversion success, comparing weight adapted (Vernakalant) and fixed dose (Ibutilide) pharmacotherapeutic cardioversion regimes.

METHODS

Within this prospective observational trial, a total of 316 episodes of AF and AFL were enrolled. Patients were stratified in either a Vernakalant ( = 181) or Ibutilide ( = 135) treatment arm, based on the chosen regime, for direct comparison of treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

Conversion to sinus rhythm was achieved in 76.3% of all cases. Of note, there was no difference comparing the Vernakalant and Ibutilide treatment arms (Vernakalant 76.2% vs. Ibutilide 76.3%; = 0.991). Within the whole study population, decreasing conversion rates with increasing body weight (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.69 (0.51-0.94); = 0.018) were observed. An independent effect of body weight within the Ibutilide treatment arm was noted, which remained stable after adjustment for potential confounders (adjusted OR = 0.55 (0.38-0.92), = 0.022.

CONCLUSION

Both, the Vernakalant and Ibutilide treatment arms showed comparable rates of treatment success in pharmacotherapeutic cardioversion of AF and AFL. Of utmost importance, we observed that the fixed dose of Ibutilide-as compared to the weight-adapted dose of Vernakalant-showed a reduced treatment success with increasing body weight.

摘要

目的

用于心房颤动(AF)和心房扑动(AFL)药物复律的药物,要么采用固定剂量给药,要么根据体重调整剂量。个体体重可能是抗心律失常治疗成功与否的一个相关混杂因素。因此,本研究的目的是通过比较根据体重调整剂量(维纳卡兰)和固定剂量(伊布利特)的药物复律方案,阐明体重对药物复律成功的影响。

方法

在这项前瞻性观察性试验中,共纳入316例AF和AFL发作患者。根据所选方案,将患者分为维纳卡兰治疗组(n = 181)或伊布利特治疗组(n = 135),以便直接比较治疗效果。

结果

所有病例中有76.3%成功转为窦性心律。值得注意的是,维纳卡兰治疗组和伊布利特治疗组之间没有差异(维纳卡兰组为76.2%,伊布利特组为76.3%;P = 0.991)。在整个研究人群中,观察到随着体重增加,复律率降低(调整后的优势比(OR)= 0.69(0.51 - 0.94);P = 0.018)。在伊布利特治疗组中观察到体重的独立影响,在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,该影响保持稳定(调整后的OR = 0.55(0.38 - 0.92),P = 0.022)。

结论

在AF和AFL的药物复律中,维纳卡兰治疗组和伊布利特治疗组的治疗成功率相当。最重要的是,我们观察到,与根据体重调整剂量的维纳卡兰相比,固定剂量的伊布利特随着体重增加治疗成功率降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d073/9456766/4da31897af68/jcm-11-05061-g0A1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验