Suppr超能文献

小儿室间隔缺损诊断性心导管检查中全身麻醉与镇静后的严重并发症

Severe Complications after General Anesthesia versus Sedation during Pediatric Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization for Ventricular Septal Defect.

作者信息

Ogawa Yuki, Yamana Hayato, Noda Tatsuya, Kishimoto Miwa, Yoshihara Shingo, Kanaoka Koshiro, Matsui Hiroki, Fushimi Kiyohide, Yasunaga Hideo, Kawaguchi Masahiko, Imamura Tomoaki

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8521, Japan.

Department of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8521, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 31;11(17):5165. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175165.

Abstract

Pediatric cardiac catheterization requires unconsciousness and immobilization through general anesthesia or sedation. This study aimed to compare the occurrence of severe complications in pediatric diagnostic cardiac catheterization for ventricular septal defect between general anesthesia and sedation performed under similar institutional environments. Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we retrospectively identified pediatric patients (aged <2 years) who underwent diagnostic cardiac catheterization for ventricular septal defect between July 2010 and March 2019. The composite outcome was the occurrence of severe complications, including catecholamine use and intensive care unit admission, within seven days after catheterization. Overlap weighting based on propensity scores was used to adjust for patient- and hospital-level confounding factors. We identified 3159 patients from 87 hospitals, including 930 under general anesthesia and 2229 under sedation. The patient- and hospital-level baseline characteristics differed between the groups. After adjustment, the proportion of patients with severe complications was significantly higher in the general anesthesia group than in the sedation group (2.4% vs. 0.6%; risk difference, 1.8% [95% confidence interval, 0.93−2.6%]). Severe complications occurred more frequently in the general anesthesia group than in the sedation group. Further research on anesthetic methods is necessary to assess the safety and accuracy of pediatric diagnostic cardiac catheterization.

摘要

小儿心导管检查需要通过全身麻醉或镇静来实现意识丧失和制动。本研究旨在比较在相似机构环境下,全身麻醉与镇静用于小儿室间隔缺损诊断性心导管检查时严重并发症的发生情况。利用日本诊断程序组合数据库,我们回顾性地确定了2010年7月至2019年3月期间接受室间隔缺损诊断性心导管检查的小儿患者(年龄<2岁)。复合结局是导管检查后7天内发生的严重并发症,包括使用儿茶酚胺和入住重症监护病房。基于倾向评分的重叠加权用于调整患者和医院层面的混杂因素。我们从87家医院中识别出3159例患者,其中930例接受全身麻醉,2229例接受镇静。两组之间患者和医院层面的基线特征有所不同。调整后,全身麻醉组严重并发症患者的比例显著高于镇静组(2.4%对0.6%;风险差异,1.8%[95%置信区间,0.93−2.6%])。全身麻醉组严重并发症的发生频率高于镇静组。有必要对麻醉方法进行进一步研究,以评估小儿诊断性心导管检查的安全性和准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed8/9457307/688bc0ccf65a/jcm-11-05165-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验