Suppr超能文献

两种粘结剂在慢速烘烤过程中的热响应机制对比研究

Comparative Study on Thermal Response Mechanism of Two Binders during Slow Cook-Off.

作者信息

Wu Xinzhou, Li Jun, Ren Hui, Jiao Qingjie

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Explosion of Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.

Science and Technology on Aerospace Chemical Power Laboratory, China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation, Xiangyang 441003, China.

出版信息

Polymers (Basel). 2022 Sep 5;14(17):3699. doi: 10.3390/polym14173699.

Abstract

The HTPE (hydroxyl-terminated polyether) propellant had a lower ignition temperature (150 °C vs. 240 °C) than the HTPB (hydroxy-terminated polybutadiene) propellant in the slow cook-off test. The reactions of the two propellants were combustion and explosion, respectively. A series of experiments including the changes of colors and the intensity of infrared characteristic peaks were designed to characterize the differences in the thermal response mechanisms of the HTPB and HTPE binder systems. As a solid phase filler to accidental ignition, the weight loss and microscopic morphology of AP (30~230 °C) were observed by TG and SEM. The defects of the propellant caused by the cook-off were quantitatively analyzed by the box counting method. Above 120 °C, the HTPE propellant began to melt and disperse in the holes, filling the cracks, which generated during the decomposition of AP at a low temperature. Melting products were called the "high-temperature self-repair body". A series of analyses proved that the different thermal responses of the two binders were the main cause of the slow cook-off results, which were likewise verified in the propellant mechanical properties and gel fraction test. From the microscopic point of view, the mechanism of HTPE's slow cook-off performance superior to HTPB was revealed in this article.

摘要

在慢速烤燃试验中,端羟基聚醚(HTPE)推进剂的点火温度(150℃,而端羟基聚丁二烯(HTPB)推进剂为240℃)更低。两种推进剂的反应分别为燃烧和爆炸。设计了一系列包括颜色变化和红外特征峰强度变化的实验,以表征HTPB和HTPE粘结剂体系热响应机制的差异。作为意外点火的固相填料,通过热重分析(TG)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察了高氯酸铵(AP,30~230℃)的失重和微观形态。用盒计数法对烤燃引起的推进剂缺陷进行了定量分析。在120℃以上,HTPE推进剂开始熔化并分散在孔洞中,填充了AP在低温分解过程中产生的裂缝。熔化产物被称为“高温自修复体”。一系列分析证明,两种粘结剂不同的热响应是慢速烤燃结果的主要原因,这在推进剂力学性能和凝胶分数试验中也得到了验证。从微观角度揭示了本文中HTPE比HTPB具有更优异的慢速烤燃性能的机理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83b9/9460848/f4aaa5d3da37/polymers-14-03699-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验