• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于卷积神经网络的震后结构快速损伤检测:案例研究。

Convolutional Neural Network-Based Rapid Post-Earthquake Structural Damage Detection: Case Study.

机构信息

Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, Toyohashi 441-8580, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;22(17):6426. doi: 10.3390/s22176426.

DOI:10.3390/s22176426
PMID:36080885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9459694/
Abstract

It is necessary to detect the structural damage condition of essential buildings immediately after an earthquake to identify safe structures, evacuate, or resume crucial activities. For this reason, a CNN methodology proposed to detect the structural damage condition of a building is here improved and validated for two currently instrumented essential buildings (Tahara City Hall and Toyohashi Fire Station). Three-dimensional frames instead of lumped mass models are used for the buildings. Besides this, a methodology to select records is introduced to reduce the variability of the structural responses. The maximum inter-storey drift and absolute acceleration of each storey are used as damage indicators. The accuracy is evaluated by the usability of the building, total damage condition, storey damage condition, and total comparison of the damage indicators. Finally, the maximum accuracy and R of the responses are obtained as follows: for the Tahara City Hall building, 90.0% and 0.825, respectively; for the Toyohashi Fire Station building, 100% and 0.909, respectively.

摘要

震后有必要立即检测重要建筑物的结构损坏情况,以识别安全结构,进行疏散或恢复关键活动。为此,本文对一种用于检测建筑物结构损坏情况的 CNN 方法进行了改进,并对两座现有仪器化的重要建筑物(田原市厅和豊桥消防局)进行了验证。该方法使用三维框架而不是集中质量模型来表示建筑物。此外,还引入了一种记录选择方法,以减少结构响应的可变性。最大层间位移和每层的绝对加速度被用作损伤指标。通过建筑物的可用性、整体损伤状况、楼层损伤状况以及损伤指标的总体比较来评估准确性。最后,得到了响应的最大精度和 R,对于田原市厅建筑,分别为 90.0%和 0.825;对于豊桥消防局建筑,分别为 100%和 0.909。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/2a703d76ca5a/sensors-22-06426-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/c811b4bec565/sensors-22-06426-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/623b7b1a0b00/sensors-22-06426-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/2b0bc78c3f7a/sensors-22-06426-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/8718534e6d24/sensors-22-06426-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/b9d0685e4e21/sensors-22-06426-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/275f2779ff04/sensors-22-06426-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/239a1a4738a2/sensors-22-06426-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/4b61c783e89d/sensors-22-06426-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/dc06e5961f43/sensors-22-06426-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/d71af6eee3ef/sensors-22-06426-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/3e62a3345589/sensors-22-06426-g011a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/5f06b085837c/sensors-22-06426-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/679ac65e05c6/sensors-22-06426-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/7bdd35492fbb/sensors-22-06426-g014a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/ff472d3c722d/sensors-22-06426-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/4076d2c9e0c7/sensors-22-06426-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/b9e909084538/sensors-22-06426-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/7932a1e1dcd6/sensors-22-06426-g018a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/76bf5bd77ebc/sensors-22-06426-g019a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/2a703d76ca5a/sensors-22-06426-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/c811b4bec565/sensors-22-06426-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/623b7b1a0b00/sensors-22-06426-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/2b0bc78c3f7a/sensors-22-06426-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/8718534e6d24/sensors-22-06426-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/b9d0685e4e21/sensors-22-06426-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/275f2779ff04/sensors-22-06426-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/239a1a4738a2/sensors-22-06426-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/4b61c783e89d/sensors-22-06426-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/dc06e5961f43/sensors-22-06426-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/d71af6eee3ef/sensors-22-06426-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/3e62a3345589/sensors-22-06426-g011a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/5f06b085837c/sensors-22-06426-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/679ac65e05c6/sensors-22-06426-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/7bdd35492fbb/sensors-22-06426-g014a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/ff472d3c722d/sensors-22-06426-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/4076d2c9e0c7/sensors-22-06426-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/b9e909084538/sensors-22-06426-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/7932a1e1dcd6/sensors-22-06426-g018a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/76bf5bd77ebc/sensors-22-06426-g019a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/9459694/2a703d76ca5a/sensors-22-06426-g020.jpg

相似文献

1
Convolutional Neural Network-Based Rapid Post-Earthquake Structural Damage Detection: Case Study.基于卷积神经网络的震后结构快速损伤检测:案例研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;22(17):6426. doi: 10.3390/s22176426.
2
Structural Response Prediction for Damage Identification Using Wavelet Spectra in Convolutional Neural Network.基于卷积神经网络中使用小波谱的损伤识别结构响应预测
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 13;21(20):6795. doi: 10.3390/s21206795.
3
Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.地震震动与建筑物损坏:近期关于强烈地面震动的证据引发了对建筑物抗震能力的质疑。
Science. 1975 Aug 22;189(4203):601-8. doi: 10.1126/science.189.4203.601.
4
Classification of Building Damage Using a Novel Convolutional Neural Network Based on Post-Disaster Aerial Images.基于灾后航空图像的新型卷积神经网络的建筑物损毁分类。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 8;22(15):5920. doi: 10.3390/s22155920.
5
Study of Building Safety Monitoring by Using Cost-Effective MEMS Accelerometers for Rapid After-Earthquake Assessment with Missing Data.利用具有成本效益的微机电系统加速度计进行建筑物安全监测的研究,用于快速进行地震后评估以及应对数据缺失。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 3;21(21):7327. doi: 10.3390/s21217327.
6
Rapid Post-Earthquake Structural Damage Assessment Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Transfer Learning.利用卷积神经网络和迁移学习进行震后结构快速损伤评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 3;22(9):3471. doi: 10.3390/s22093471.
7
GroningenNet: Deep Learning for Low-Magnitude Earthquake Detection on a Multi-Level Sensor Network.格罗宁根网络:多级传感器网络上的小震检测的深度学习。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 2;21(23):8080. doi: 10.3390/s21238080.
8
Machine Learning-Based Rapid Post-Earthquake Damage Detection of RC Resisting-Moment Frame Buildings.基于机器学习的 RC 抗侧力框架结构震后快速损伤检测。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 12;23(10):4694. doi: 10.3390/s23104694.
9
Multi-Sensor and Decision-Level Fusion-Based Structural Damage Detection Using a One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network.基于多传感器和决策级融合的一维卷积神经网络结构损伤检测。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 8;21(12):3950. doi: 10.3390/s21123950.
10
Earthquake Event Recognition on Smartphones Based on Neural Network Models.基于神经网络模型的智能手机地震事件识别。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 13;22(22):8769. doi: 10.3390/s22228769.

引用本文的文献

1
A dynamic strain prediction method for malfunction of sensors in buildings subjected to seismic loads using CWT and CNN.一种基于连续小波变换(CWT)和卷积神经网络(CNN)的地震作用下建筑物传感器故障动态应变预测方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 15;14(1):28156. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79751-y.
2
Machine Learning-Based Rapid Post-Earthquake Damage Detection of RC Resisting-Moment Frame Buildings.基于机器学习的 RC 抗侧力框架结构震后快速损伤检测。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 12;23(10):4694. doi: 10.3390/s23104694.

本文引用的文献

1
Structural Response Prediction for Damage Identification Using Wavelet Spectra in Convolutional Neural Network.基于卷积神经网络中使用小波谱的损伤识别结构响应预测
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 13;21(20):6795. doi: 10.3390/s21206795.
2
Multi-Sensor and Decision-Level Fusion-Based Structural Damage Detection Using a One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network.基于多传感器和决策级融合的一维卷积神经网络结构损伤检测。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 8;21(12):3950. doi: 10.3390/s21123950.
3
A Data-Driven Damage Identification Framework Based on Transmissibility Function Datasets and One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks: Verification on a Structural Health Monitoring Benchmark Structure.
基于传递函数数据集和一维卷积神经网络的数据驱动损伤识别框架:在结构健康监测基准结构上的验证。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 15;20(4):1059. doi: 10.3390/s20041059.