• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在Latarjet手术中,喙突固定的最佳位置是什么?

What is the best position for coracoid fixation in the Latarjet procedure?

作者信息

Stirma Guilherme Augusto, Ribeiro Leandro Massini, Gaio Evandro Dias, Belangero Paulo Santoro, Antonio de Figueiredo Eduardo, de Castro Pochini Alberto, Andreoli Carlos Vicente, Ejnisman Benno

机构信息

Federal University of São Paulo, Paulista School of Medicine - UNIFESP, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

JSES Int. 2022 Jun 11;6(5):748-754. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.008. eCollection 2022 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.008
PMID:36081693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9446280/
Abstract

HYPOTHESIS

Multiple problems and complications associated with Latarjet fixation have been described; thus, this is the first study in the literature to identify the maximum allowed screw clamping force and best fixation screw position for Latarjet surgery.

METHODS

A variation of distal and proximal coracoid screw positions with and without a flat washer was evaluated through finite element analysis, at a minimum distance of 3 mm from the edge. A loading progression test was performed until the maximum stress reached a limit imposed by the bone yield. We identified the maximum allowed screw clamping force based on a von Mises and maximum principal stresses failure theory.

RESULTS

When using the flat washer, the cortical bone generally has only space for 1 piece. For this reason, as a primary study, it was observed that when the distal screw was more than 7 mm from the edge, the clamping force supported will be higher than that during the proximal fixation regardless of the proximal location screw. We have found that the best position is 7 mm from the distal edge, with the highest compression of 445 N (7 mm proximal distance, 5 mm distal distance) in due respect to the von Mises failure theory. To get around this lack of space situation, in this study, we have proposed a fixation plate to replace the flat washer. This plate has shown very interesting values when compared to the previously flat washer study, but now, for both screw holes. With those results, we can assure that using a fixation plate like this will ensure surgery safety and higher allowed compression force when clamping the bolts.

CONCLUSION

The distal screw provided higher tensile strength values when located more than 7 mm from the coracoid edge. The geometry of the coracoid in its distal position supports higher stress loads than in the proximal position. When the flat washer was in the proximal position, the coracoid was submitted with a more distributed and uniform load, preventing localized bone damage as a crush.

摘要

假设

已描述了与Latarjet固定相关的多种问题和并发症;因此,本研究是文献中首次确定Latarjet手术允许的最大螺钉夹紧力和最佳固定螺钉位置的研究。

方法

通过有限元分析评估了有无平垫圈时喙突远端和近端螺钉位置的变化,距边缘的最小距离为3mm。进行加载进程测试,直至最大应力达到骨屈服所施加的极限。我们基于冯·米塞斯和最大主应力失效理论确定了允许的最大螺钉夹紧力。

结果

使用平垫圈时,皮质骨通常仅能容纳1枚螺钉。因此,作为初步研究观察到,当远端螺钉距边缘超过7mm时,无论近端螺钉位置如何,其支撑的夹紧力均高于近端固定时的夹紧力。我们发现最佳位置是距远端边缘7mm,根据冯·米塞斯失效理论,此时最大压缩力为445N(近端距离7mm,远端距离5mm)。为解决这种空间不足的情况,在本研究中,我们提出了一种固定板来替代平垫圈。与之前的平垫圈研究相比,该固定板在两个螺钉孔处均显示出非常有趣的值。基于这些结果,我们可以确保使用这样的固定板将确保手术安全,并在夹紧螺栓时允许更高的压缩力。

结论

当远端螺钉距喙突边缘超过7mm时,其提供更高的拉伸强度值。喙突远端位置的几何形状比近端位置能承受更高的应力负荷。当平垫圈位于近端位置时,喙突承受的载荷分布更均匀,可防止局部骨损伤如挤压伤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/7debfc02bcd5/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/7cc0cd0ebe6f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/6658c05e3029/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/621de71554bf/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/be7d213aeffd/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/dca45fcbabdc/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/756670708b25/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/aa704512079c/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/c708876e798e/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/7debfc02bcd5/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/7cc0cd0ebe6f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/6658c05e3029/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/621de71554bf/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/be7d213aeffd/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/dca45fcbabdc/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/756670708b25/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/aa704512079c/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/c708876e798e/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0224/9446280/7debfc02bcd5/gr9.jpg

相似文献

1
What is the best position for coracoid fixation in the Latarjet procedure?在Latarjet手术中,喙突固定的最佳位置是什么?
JSES Int. 2022 Jun 11;6(5):748-754. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.008. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Understanding the causes behind coracoid graft osteolysıs in latarjet procedure (finite element analysis and comparison of three fixation methods).了解肩锁关节前脱位切开复位内固定术(有限元分析及三种固定方法比较)中喙突骨吸收的原因。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
3
Comparison of two coracoid process transfer techniques on stress shielding using three-dimensional finite-element model.两种喙突转移技术在三维有限元模型下对应力遮挡的比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jul 30;17(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03264-5.
4
Proximal-medial part in the coracoid graft demonstrates the most evident stress shielding following the Latarjet procedure: a simulation study using the 3-dimensional finite element method.喙突移植物的近内侧部分在 Latarjet 手术后表现出最明显的应力遮挡:使用三维有限元方法的模拟研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Dec;29(12):2632-2639. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.037. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
5
Coracoid bone graft osteolysis after Latarjet procedure: A comparison study between two screws standard technique vs mini-plate fixation.拉塔热手术(Latarjet procedure)后喙突骨移植骨溶解:两种螺钉标准技术与微型钢板固定的比较研究
Int J Shoulder Surg. 2013 Jan;7(1):1-6. doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.109877.
6
The Effect of Screw Design and Cortical Augmentation on Insertional Torque and Compression in Coracoid-Glenoid Fixation in a Sawbones Model.在仿骨模型中,螺钉设计和皮质增强对喙锁固定中插入扭矩和压缩的影响。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Mar;36(3):689-695. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
7
Biomechanical Comparison of Screw Fixation Versus a Cortical Button and Self-tensioning Suture for the Latarjet Procedure.Latarjet手术中螺钉固定与皮质纽扣及自张紧缝线固定的生物力学比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Jun 14;6(6):2325967118777842. doi: 10.1177/2325967118777842. eCollection 2018 Jun.
8
Intra-articular biomechanical environment following modified Bristow and Latarjet procedures in shoulders with large glenoid defects: relationship with postoperative complications.改良 Bristow 和 Latarjet 术式治疗伴有大骨缺损肩盂的关节内生物力学环境:与术后并发症的关系。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct;30(10):2260-2269. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
9
A biomechanical evaluation of bicortical metal screw fixation versus absorbable interference screw fixation after coracoid transfer for anterior shoulder instability.喙突转移治疗复发性肩关节前脱位中皮质骨螺钉固定与可吸收界面螺钉固定的生物力学评估。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Oct;27(10):1358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.03.074. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
10
Cortical suture button fixation vs. bicortical screw fixation in the Latarjet procedure: a biomechanical comparison.喙突基底螺钉固定与皮质骨缝合纽扣固定在 Latarjet 手术中的比较:一项生物力学比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7):1470-1478. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.11.025. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of posteroanterior reference guides for bone block or coracoid process transfer in anterior glenohumeral instability: a cadaveric study of the relationship to the suprascapular nerve.在肩肱关节前向不稳中使用后前位参考导向器进行骨块或喙突转移:一项关于其与肩胛上神经关系的尸体研究
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2025 Feb;28(1):3-8. doi: 10.5397/cise.2024.00465. Epub 2024 Dec 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanical Analysis of Plate Fixation Compared With Various Screw Configurations for Use in the Latarjet Procedure.用于Latarjet手术的钢板固定与各种螺钉配置的生物力学分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jul 14;8(7):2325967120931399. doi: 10.1177/2325967120931399. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Glenoid track evaluation by a validated finite-element shoulder numerical model.基于验证有限元肩部数值模型的肩盂轨迹评估。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Jun;106(4):735-742. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 May 16.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Coracoid Graft Dimensions in the Latarjet Surgery for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability.
用于治疗前肩肱关节不稳的Latarjet手术中喙突移植骨尺寸的比较评估
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020 Apr;55(2):215-220. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1698801. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
4
Biomechanical evaluation of suture buttons versus cortical screws in the Latarjet-Bristow procedure: a fresh-frozen cadavers study.喙锁间螺钉固定与缝线纽扣固定在 Latarjet-Bristow 手术中的生物力学评估:新鲜冷冻尸体研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Dec;139(12):1779-1783. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03269-6. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
5
Arthroscopic Latarjet: Suture-Button Fixation Is a Safe and Reliable Alternative to Screw Fixation.关节镜下 Latarjet 术:缝线纽扣固定是螺钉固定的一种安全可靠的替代方法。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Apr;35(4):1050-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.012. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
6
Biomechanical Comparison of Screw Fixation Versus a Cortical Button and Self-tensioning Suture for the Latarjet Procedure.Latarjet手术中螺钉固定与皮质纽扣及自张紧缝线固定的生物力学比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Jun 14;6(6):2325967118777842. doi: 10.1177/2325967118777842. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
Monocortical fixation of the coracoid in the Latarjet procedure is significantly weaker than bicortical fixation.喙突骨块的单皮质固定在 Latarjet 手术中明显弱于双皮质固定。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):239-244. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4837-2. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
8
Biomechanical Analysis of Latarjet Screw Fixation: Comparison of Screw Types and Fixation Methods.Latarjet螺钉固定的生物力学分析:螺钉类型与固定方法的比较
Arthroscopy. 2017 Sep;33(9):1646-1653. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.030. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
9
Preoperative CT planning of screw length in arthroscopic Latarjet.关节镜下 Latarjet 中螺钉长度的术前 CT 规划。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jan;26(1):24-30. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4286-8. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
10
Do the traditional and modified latarjet techniques produce equivalent reconstruction stability and strength?传统和改良的 Latarjet 技术是否产生等效的重建稳定性和强度?
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Dec;40(12):2801-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546512460835. Epub 2012 Sep 28.