• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊与住院患者使用合成渗透压扩张器进行预诱导宫颈成熟的比较:一项随机临床试验。

Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lawrence Hospital, Bronxville New York.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct 1;140(4):584-590. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004942. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004942
PMID:36083097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9484761/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether outpatient cervical ripening with a synthetic osmotic dilator shortens the length of hospital stay in term pregnancies undergoing labor induction.

METHODS

Pregnant participants scheduled for labor induction at term with unfavorable cervix (less than 3-cm dilated and less than 60% effaced) and not requiring inpatient maternal or fetal monitoring were consented, and synthetic osmotic dilator rods were inserted on the day of scheduled induction. After reassuring fetal heart tracing, patients randomized to the outpatient group were asked to return 12 hours after insertion or sooner if needed. Those randomized to the inpatient group remained in the hospital. After the first round of ripening, additional ripening, oxytocin, and labor management were left up to the clinical health care professionals. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with hospital stays longer than 48 hours. We estimated that a sample size of 338 would provide 85% power to detect a 30% difference between groups.

RESULTS

From November 2018 to November 2021, 339 participants were randomized (171 inpatient, 167 outpatient, one withdrawal). Four patients in the outpatient group were admitted before12 hours for suspected labor and rupture of membranes, and 19 in the inpatient group had the device removed before 12 hours. The proportion of participants with hospital stays longer than 48 hours was lower in the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group (89 [53%] vs 152 [89%], relative risk [RR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.52-0.70). Patients in the outpatient group had a shorter total length of stay and time from admission to active labor. They were more likely to have a vaginal delivery within 24 hours of admission and were less likely to receive analgesics during ripening. Route of delivery and other maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient cervical ripening with a cervical osmotic dilator decreased hospital stay compared with inpatient ripening, without significant adverse outcomes.

FUNDING SOURCE

Medicem Technology s.r.o., Czech Republic.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03665688.

摘要

目的

评估在足月妊娠引产中,门诊使用合成渗透扩张器进行宫颈成熟是否能缩短住院时间。

方法

纳入计划在足月时引产且宫颈条件不佳(宫颈扩张小于 3cm 且宫颈管消失小于 60%)且无需住院监测产妇或胎儿的孕妇,在计划引产日插入合成渗透扩张器。在胎儿心电图监测结果令人安心后,将门诊组患者随机分组,在插入后 12 小时或有需要时提前返回。住院组患者则留在医院。第一轮成熟后,其他成熟、催产素和分娩管理由临床医护人员决定。主要结局为住院时间超过 48 小时的患者比例。我们估计,338 名参与者的样本量将有 85%的效力来检测两组之间 30%的差异。

结果

2018 年 11 月至 2021 年 11 月,共 339 名参与者被随机分组(门诊 171 例,住院 167 例,1 例退出)。门诊组有 4 例患者在 12 小时前因疑似临产和胎膜破裂而住院,住院组有 19 例患者在 12 小时前取出了装置。与住院组相比,门诊组住院时间超过 48 小时的患者比例较低(89[53%]例比 152[89%]例,相对风险[RR]0.60,95%CI0.52-0.70)。门诊组患者的总住院时间和从入院到活跃分娩的时间更短。她们在入院后 24 小时内阴道分娩的可能性更高,在成熟过程中使用止痛药的可能性更低。两组的分娩方式和其他母婴结局没有显著差异。

结论

与住院成熟相比,门诊使用宫颈渗透扩张器进行宫颈成熟可缩短住院时间,且无明显不良结局。

资金来源

捷克共和国 Medicem Technology s.r.o.。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03665688。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cca9/9484761/343b9e1a9ff9/ong-140-584-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cca9/9484761/343b9e1a9ff9/ong-140-584-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cca9/9484761/343b9e1a9ff9/ong-140-584-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator: A Randomized Clinical Trial.门诊与住院患者使用合成渗透压扩张器进行预诱导宫颈成熟的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct 1;140(4):584-590. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004942. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Cervical Ripening Efficacy of Synthetic Osmotic Cervical Dilator Compared With Oral Misoprostol at Term: A Randomized Controlled Trial.足月时合成渗透压宫颈扩张器与口服米索前列醇在宫颈成熟方面的效果比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun 1;139(6):1083-1091. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004799. Epub 2022 May 2.
3
Labor Induction Outcomes with Outpatient Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening among Low-Risk Women.低风险女性门诊使用米索前列醇促宫颈成熟引产的结局
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e818-e826. doi: 10.1055/a-1948-2779. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Parous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.产妇经阴道分娩产后留置 Foley 尿管用于引产:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):94-101. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002678.
5
Cervical ripening as an outpatient procedure in the pandemic - minimizing the inpatient days and lowering the socioeconomic costs.在大流行期间作为门诊程序进行宫颈成熟 - 最大限度地减少住院天数并降低社会经济成本。
J Perinat Med. 2022 Aug 9;50(9):1180-1188. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0196. Print 2022 Nov 25.
6
A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E₂ (OPRA study).一项比较前列腺素 E₂(OPRA 研究)门诊与住院宫颈成熟的随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2015 Jan;122(1):94-104. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12846. Epub 2014 May 14.
7
Moving preinduction cervical ripening to a lower acuity inpatient setting using the synthetic hygroscopic cervical dilator: a cost-consequence analysis for the United States.使用合成吸湿宫颈扩张器将诱导前宫颈成熟转移至较低急症住院环境:美国的成本效益分析
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):1185-1198. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2136854.
8
Induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix after a cesarean using an osmotic dilator versus vaginal prostaglandin.剖宫产术后宫颈条件不佳患者使用渗透扩张器与阴道前列腺素引产的比较
J Perinat Med. 2018 Apr 25;46(3):299-307. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2017-0029.
9
Outpatient versus inpatient cervical ripening with a slow-release dinoprostone vaginal insert in term pregnancies on maternal, neonatal, and birth outcomes: A systematic review.足月妊娠产妇、新生儿和分娩结局的经阴道慢释放地诺前列酮栓与门诊和住院宫颈成熟的比较:系统评价。
Birth. 2023 Sep;50(3):473-485. doi: 10.1111/birt.12687. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
10
Cervical ripening after cesarean section: a prospective dual center study comparing a mechanical osmotic dilator vs. prostaglandin E2.剖宫产术后宫颈成熟:一项比较机械渗透扩张器与前列腺素 E2 的前瞻性双中心研究。
J Perinat Med. 2021 Aug 2;49(7):797-805. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0157. Print 2021 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Outpatient elective induction of labour at 39 weeks' gestation (HOME INDUCTION): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase III, non-inferiority trial.孕39周门诊选择性引产(家庭引产):一项开放标签、随机、对照、III期、非劣效性试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jul 17;74:102741. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102741. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Synthetic Osmotic Dilators for Pre-Induction Cervical Ripening - an Evidence-Based Review.用于引产术前宫颈成熟的合成渗透性扩张剂——一项基于证据的综述
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023 Jul 7;83(12):1491-1499. doi: 10.1055/a-2103-8329. eCollection 2023 Dec.