Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS.
Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Curr Opin Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;34(6):595-605. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000905. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
Longitudinal evaluation of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) represents a promising tool for monitoring tumour evolution. In patients with breast cancer, ctDNA dynamics for the assessment of molecular residual disease (MRD) and resistances may, respectively, help clinicians in treatment modulation of adjuvant treatments, and in anticipating resistance to ongoing treatments and switch treatments before clinical progression, to improve disease control. Anyway, the introduction of this dynamic biomarker into clinical practice requires the demonstration of analytical validity, clinical validity and clinical utility.
In early breast cancer setting, several observational studies demonstrated the clinical validity of MRD monitoring through ctDNA in identifying patients at a higher risk of relapse, but many clinical trials evaluating the clinical utility are still ongoing, and few data resulted in inconclusive results.Instead, ctDNA dynamics for intercepting resistance have not been fully evaluated in terms of clinical validity, because monitoring schedules of most observational studies are not intensive. The only trial assessing their clinical utility (PADA-1) demonstrated a benefit in terms of progression-free survival, portraying a new landscape for clinical trials in this space.
Rigorous clinical trials with adequate assays and patient-relevant endpoints are paramount to demonstrate the clinical utility of ctDNA dynamics and eventually increase clinical outcomes.
循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)的纵向评估代表了一种很有前途的监测肿瘤演变的工具。在乳腺癌患者中,ctDNA 动态变化用于评估分子残留疾病(MRD)和耐药性,可能分别有助于临床医生调整辅助治疗,以及在临床进展前提前预测对现有治疗的耐药性并更换治疗方案,从而改善疾病控制。无论如何,将这种动态生物标志物引入临床实践需要证明其分析有效性、临床有效性和临床实用性。
在早期乳腺癌环境中,几项观察性研究通过 ctDNA 监测 MRD 证明了其临床有效性,能够识别出复发风险较高的患者,但许多评估临床实用性的临床试验仍在进行中,而且很少有数据得出不确定的结果。相反,ctDNA 动态变化在耐药性方面的临床有效性尚未得到充分评估,因为大多数观察性研究的监测方案不够密集。唯一一项评估其临床实用性的试验(PADA-1)在无进展生存期方面显示出获益,为该领域的临床试验描绘了新的前景。
具有适当检测方法和与患者相关终点的严格临床试验对于证明 ctDNA 动态变化的临床实用性并最终提高临床结果至关重要。