California School of Professional Psychology, Alliant International University, San Diego, California, USA.
J Trauma Dissociation. 2023 Mar-Apr;24(2):214-228. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2022.2119633. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
The current study assessed the reliability and validity of three measures of dissociation. Three hundred students completed the Dissociative Experiences Scale Revised (DESR), the Dissociative Experiences Scale-II (DES-II), and the Dissociative Experiences Scale Comparison (DESC); an additional 252 community adults evaluated clarity of instructions. Findings revealed that the three dissociation measures showed acceptable test-retest reliability and Cronbach's alphas. The DESR and DES-II strongly intercorrelated, but the DESC correlated only moderately with the two remaining dissociation measures, sharing less than 10% of the variance with the original scale. Additionally, the DESR and DES-II showed stronger convergent validity (correlation with measures of alexithymia and post-traumatic stress disorder) than did the DESC. The DESC was the only measure unrelated to trauma history. Participants reported substantially greater difficulty in understanding and utilizing the metric offered by the DESC. In conclusion, evidence supports the DES-II and DESR as alternate measures, but the DESC requires more investigation.
本研究评估了三种分离度量的可靠性和有效性。三百名学生完成了修订后的分离体验量表(DESR)、分离体验量表-II(DES-II)和分离体验量表比较(DESC);另有 252 名社区成年人评估了指导说明的清晰度。研究结果表明,三种分离度量具有可接受的重测信度和克朗巴赫阿尔法系数。DESR 和 DES-II 高度相关,但 DESC 与其余两种分离度量仅中度相关,与原始量表共享不到 10%的方差。此外,DESR 和 DES-II 与述情障碍和创伤后应激障碍的测量具有更强的收敛效度(相关性),而 DESC 则没有。DESC 是唯一与创伤史无关的度量。参与者报告称,理解和使用 DESC 提供的度量标准存在很大的困难。总之,证据支持 DES-II 和 DESR 作为替代度量,但 DESC 需要进一步调查。