de Wit H, Uhlenhuth E H, Johanson C E
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1987 Aug;42(2):127-36. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1987.122.
The reinforcing properties of amphetamine were assessed in two groups of subjects for whom the drug was hypothesized to be a more effective reinforcer than for control subjects. Preference for amphetamine (5 and 10 mg) over placebo was evaluated in subjects who were concerned about being overweight (n = 13), in subjects with depression (n = 15), and in control subjects (n = 25). Subjective effects of the drugs were measured by self-report questionnaires. All three groups chose 5 mg d-amphetamine as often as they chose placebo. The control and weight-concern group chose 10 mg d-amphetamine significantly more often than placebo. Neither the choice behavior nor the subjective effects of the drug indicated that amphetamine was a more effective positive reinforcer in the experimental groups, because of either its anorectic properties or its presumed antidepressant properties. The results are discussed in terms of the relative risk for stimulant abuse in populations with these characteristics.
在两组受试者中评估了苯丙胺的强化特性,对于这两组受试者,假设该药物比对照组受试者是一种更有效的强化物。在担心超重的受试者(n = 13)、抑郁症患者(n = 15)和对照组受试者(n = 25)中评估了对苯丙胺(5毫克和10毫克)相对于安慰剂的偏好。通过自我报告问卷测量药物的主观效果。所有三组选择5毫克右旋苯丙胺的频率与选择安慰剂的频率相同。对照组和担心体重组选择10毫克右旋苯丙胺的频率明显高于安慰剂。无论是选择行为还是药物的主观效果都表明,由于其食欲抑制特性或假定的抗抑郁特性,苯丙胺在实验组中并不是一种更有效的阳性强化物。根据具有这些特征的人群中兴奋剂滥用的相对风险对结果进行了讨论。