Johanson C E, Uhlenhuth E H
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;71(3):275-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00433062.
A total of 31 normal human volunteers participated in a nine-session experiment. During the first four sessions, they received alternately 5 mg d-amphetamine or placebo. During the next five sessions, they were given a choice between amphetamine and placebo. Subjective effects were assessed using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) before the drug was taken and 1, 3, and 6 h later. Subjects chose amphetamine a mean of 4.03 times. Compared with placebo, amphetamine produced changes in mood on the POMS including increased Vigor, Elation, Friendliness, Arousal and Positive Mood and decreased Confusion. These differences were greatest 3 hr after ingestion. Mood changes produced by d-amphetamine were comparable in all subjects regardless of the actual number of times each chose the drug. These data suggest that that subjective effects do not predict drug choice. The results are discussed in terms of developing methods for predicting the abuse potential of psychotropic drugs.
共有31名正常人类志愿者参与了一项为期九节的实验。在前四节实验中,他们交替服用5毫克右旋苯丙胺或安慰剂。在接下来的五节实验中,他们可以在苯丙胺和安慰剂之间进行选择。在服药前以及服药后1小时、3小时和6小时,使用情绪状态剖面图(POMS)评估主观效果。受试者选择苯丙胺的平均次数为4.03次。与安慰剂相比,苯丙胺使POMS上的情绪发生了变化,包括活力、兴奋、友好、觉醒和积极情绪增加,困惑减少。这些差异在服药后3小时最为明显。无论每个受试者实际选择药物的次数如何,右旋苯丙胺产生的情绪变化在所有受试者中都是可比的。这些数据表明,主观效果并不能预测药物选择。本文根据开发预测精神药物滥用潜力的方法对结果进行了讨论。