Research Centre for Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Leiden University Center for Linguistics and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Netherlands.
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Oct 10;175:108367. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108367. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
Pronunciation of words or morphemes may vary systematically in different phonological contexts, but it remains unclear how different levels of phonological information are encoded in speech production. In this study, we investigated the online planning process of Mandarin Tone 3 (T3) sandhi, a case of phonological alternation whereby a low-dipping tone (T3) changes to a Tone 2 (T2)-like rising tone when followed by another T3. To examine the time course of the encoding of the abstract category-level (underlying form) and context-specific phonological form (surface form) of T3, we conducted an electroencephalographic (EEG) study with a phonologically-primed picture naming task and examined the event-related potentials (ERPs) time-locked to the stimulus onset as well as speech response onset. The behavioral results showed that targets primed by T3 or T2 primes yielded shorter naming latencies than those primed by control primes. Importantly, the EEG data revealed that T3 primes elicited larger positive amplitude over broad frontocentral regions roughly in the 320-550 ms time window of stimulus-locked ERP and -500 to -400 ms time window of response-locked ERP, whereas T2 primes elicited larger negative amplitude over left frontocentral regions roughly in the -240 to -100 ms time window of response-locked ERP. These results indicate that the underlying and the surface form are encoded at different processing stages. The former presumably occurs in the earlier phonological encoding stage, while the latter probably occurs in the later phonetic encoding or motor preparation stage. The current study offers important implications for understanding the processing of phonological alternations and tonal encoding in Chinese word production.
单词或语素的发音在不同的语音环境中可能会系统地变化,但语音产生中不同层次的语音信息是如何编码的仍不清楚。在这项研究中,我们调查了普通话第三声(T3)连读的在线规划过程,这是一种语音交替的情况,当一个低降调(T3)后面跟着另一个 T3 时,它会变成一个类似于第二声(T2)的上升调。为了考察 T3 的抽象类别水平(底层形式)和上下文特定的语音形式(表面形式)的编码时间进程,我们进行了一项基于语音启动的图片命名任务的脑电(EEG)研究,并对刺激起始和言语反应起始时间锁定的事件相关电位(ERP)进行了检查。行为结果表明,T3 或 T2 启动的目标比控制启动的目标产生更短的命名潜伏期。重要的是,EEG 数据显示,T3 启动在刺激锁定 ERP 的 320-550ms 时间窗口和反应锁定 ERP 的-500 至-400ms 时间窗口内诱发更大的正波幅,而 T2 启动在反应锁定 ERP 的-240 至-100ms 时间窗口内诱发更大的负波幅。这些结果表明,底层和表面形式在不同的处理阶段进行编码。前者可能发生在早期的语音编码阶段,而后者可能发生在稍后的语音编码或运动准备阶段。本研究为理解汉语词产生中的语音交替和声调编码的处理提供了重要启示。