• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A pilot study on the quality of data management in a cancer clinical trial.

作者信息

van der Putten E, van der Velden J W, Siers A, Hamersma E A

出版信息

Control Clin Trials. 1987 Jun;8(2):96-100. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90034-1.

DOI:10.1016/0197-2456(87)90034-1
PMID:3608510
Abstract

Twelve institutional data managers were asked to independently code the data from a patient chart of one patient in an ovarian cancer trial. They abstracted data from the medical record and filled out three types of trial forms (on-study, chemotherapy, and summary forms). The analysis of the processed data revealed that the median rate of errors was 13% for the 12 data managers. The error rate differed among the types of trial forms. The factors causing these errors were mistakes in interpretation, documentation, and coding. The level of experience of the data managers proved to be an important factor. It became clear that the documentation in the medical record was inadequate. We conclude that data managers as well as physicians involved in cancer clinical trials need specific training and that the quality of data management in cancer clinical trials is an important issue for further investigation.

摘要

相似文献

1
A pilot study on the quality of data management in a cancer clinical trial.
Control Clin Trials. 1987 Jun;8(2):96-100. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90034-1.
2
Quality control of validity of data collected in clinical trials. EORTC Study Group on Data Management (SGDM).
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1989 Aug;25(8):1241-7. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(89)90421-5.
3
Computerized automation of clinical trials.临床试验的计算机自动化
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Dec;4(4):771-86. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(05)80343-8.
4
Potential pooling opportunities: cancer.潜在的合并机会:癌症。
Stat Med. 1987 Apr-May;6(3):307-14. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060318.
5
Fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup: Recommendations on incorporating patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials in epithelial ovarian cancer.妇科肿瘤研究组第五届卵巢癌共识会议:关于将患者报告的结局纳入上皮性卵巢癌临床试验的建议。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jun;78:133-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
6
Logistics and management of clinical trials.临床试验的后勤保障与管理
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982 Jul;14(1):25-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb04930.x.
7
Ethical communication in clinical trials. Issues faced by data managers in obtaining informed consent.临床试验中的伦理沟通。数据管理者在获取知情同意书时面临的问题。
Cancer. 2002 Dec 1;95(11):2414-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10994.
8
Core symptom measures in cancer clinical trials.癌症临床试验中的核心症状测量指标。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jul 8;106(7). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju173. Print 2014 Jul.
9
Evaluating the financial impact of clinical trials in oncology: results from a pilot study from the Association of American Cancer Institutes/Northwestern University clinical trials costs and charges project.评估肿瘤学临床试验的财务影响:美国癌症研究所/西北大学临床试验成本与收费项目试点研究的结果
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Aug;18(15):2805-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.15.2805.
10
The conduct of a cooperative clinical trial.一项合作临床试验的实施。
Recent Results Cancer Res. 1981;77:1-75. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-81630-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Error Rates of Data Processing Methods in Clinical Research: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Manuscripts Identified Through PubMed.临床研究中数据处理方法的错误率:通过PubMed识别的手稿的系统评价和荟萃分析
Res Sq. 2023 Dec 21:rs.3.rs-2386986. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2386986/v2.
2
Overcoming challenges to data quality in the ASPREE clinical trial.克服 ASPREE 临床试验中数据质量的挑战。
Trials. 2019 Dec 9;20(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3789-2.
3
The role of medical registries, potential applications and limitations.医学登记处的作用、潜在应用及局限性。
Med Pharm Rep. 2019 Jan;92(1):7-14. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-1015. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
4
Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦一项随机对照试验中综合数据质量保证方案的实施与结果
Trials. 2017 Sep 7;18(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2159-1.
5
Adverse drug event reporting systems: a systematic review.药品不良事件报告系统:一项系统综述
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul;82(1):17-29. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12944. Epub 2016 May 9.
6
What can we learn from a decade of database audits? The Duke Clinical Research Institute experience, 1997--2006.从十年的数据库审计中我们能学到什么?杜克临床研究所的经验,1997 - 2006年。
Clin Trials. 2009 Apr;6(2):141-50. doi: 10.1177/1740774509102590.
7
Analysis of data errors in clinical research databases.临床研究数据库中的数据错误分析。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6;2008:242-6.
8
Quantifying data quality for clinical trials using electronic data capture.使用电子数据捕获技术量化临床试验的数据质量。
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 25;3(8):e3049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003049.
9
Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework.界定与提升医学登记处的数据质量:文献综述、案例研究及通用框架
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 Nov-Dec;9(6):600-11. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1087.