Hassan Abbas M, Nguyen Huan T, Corkum Joseph P, Liu Jun, Kapur Sahil K, Chu Carrie K, Tamirisa Nina, Offodile Anaeze C
Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jan;30(1):80-87. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12506-z. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
Neighborhood-level factors have been shown to influence surgical outcomes through material deprivation, psychosocial mechanisms, health behaviors, and access to resources. To date, no study has examined the relationship between area-level deprivation (ADI) and post-mastectomy outcomes.
A cross-sectional survey of adult female breast cancer patients who underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy between January 2018 to June 2019 was carried out. Patient-specific characteristics and ADI information were abstracted and correlated with postoperative global- (SF-12) and condition-specific (BREAST-Q) quality-of-life performance via multivariable regression. Patients were classified into three ADI terciles: 0-39 (low deprivation), 40-59 (moderate deprivation), and 60-100 (high deprivation).
A total of 564 consecutive patients were identified, being mostly white (75%) with mean age of 60.2 ± 12.4 years, median body mass index of 27.8 [interquartile range (IQR) 24.3-32.2) kg/m, median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 3 (IQR 2-5), and mean ADI of 42.3 ± 25.7. African American and Hispanic patients and those with high BMI were more likely to reside in highly deprived neighborhoods (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001). In adjusted models, patients in highly deprived neighborhoods had significantly lower mean SF-12 physical (44.9 [95% CI, 43.8-46.0] versus 44.9 [95% CI, 43.7-46.1] versus 46.3 [95% CI, 45.3-47.3], p = 0.03) and BREAST-Q psychosocial well-being scores (63.5 [95% CI, 59.32-67.8] versus 69.3 [95% CI, 65.1-73.6] versus 69.7 [95% CI, 66.4-73.1], p = 0.01) relative to moderate- and low-deprivation groups.
Patients residing in the most deprived neighborhoods were identified to have worse psychological well-being and quality-of-life. The ADI should be incorporated into the shared decision-making process and perioperative counseling to engender value-based and personalized care, especially for vulnerable populations.
邻里层面的因素已被证明可通过物质匮乏、心理社会机制、健康行为及资源获取来影响手术结果。迄今为止,尚无研究探讨区域层面的匮乏(地区剥夺指数,ADI)与乳房切除术后结果之间的关系。
对2018年1月至2019年6月期间接受肿块切除术或乳房切除术的成年女性乳腺癌患者进行了一项横断面调查。提取患者的特定特征和ADI信息,并通过多变量回归分析将其与术后总体(SF-12)及特定病情(BREAST-Q)的生活质量表现进行关联。患者被分为三个ADI三分位数组:0 - 39(低匮乏)、40 - 59(中度匮乏)和60 - 100(高匮乏)。
共纳入564例连续患者,大多数为白人(75%),平均年龄60.2±12.4岁,体重指数中位数为27.8[四分位间距(IQR)24.3 - 32.2]kg/m²,查尔森合并症指数中位数为3(IQR 2 - 5),平均ADI为42.3±25.7。非裔美国人和西班牙裔患者以及体重指数高的患者更有可能居住在高度匮乏的社区(p = 0.003和p < 0.001)。在调整模型中,与中度和低度匮乏组相比,居住在高度匮乏社区的患者SF-12身体维度平均得分显著更低(44.9[95%置信区间,43.8 - 46.0] 对比 44.9[95%置信区间,43.7 - 46.1] 对比 46.3[95%置信区间,45.3 - 47.3],p = 0.03),BREAST-Q心理幸福感得分也显著更低(63.5[95%置信区间,59.32 - 67.8] 对比 69.3[95%置信区间,65. l - 73.6] 对比 69.7[95%置信区间,66.4 - 73.1],p = 0.01)。
居住在最匮乏社区的患者心理幸福感和生活质量较差。ADI应纳入共同决策过程和围手术期咨询,以实现基于价值的个性化护理,尤其是针对弱势群体。