Qatar University, Doha, Qatar; Faculty of Health, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK.
Plymouth Marjon University, Plymouth, UK.
Br Dent J. 2022 Sep;233(5):415-422. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4923-1. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
Aims To explore experiences and perceptions of students and staff regarding decolonisation of the curriculum in a dental undergraduate programme.Methods Participants were invited to respond to an online survey on decolonisation of the dental curriculum. The target population included current students on the Bachelor of Dental Surgery and Bachelor of Dental Therapy and Hygiene programmes, as well as dental staff at a university in the South West region of England. The common items for student and staff versions of the survey were focused on six themes: representation; content; peer engagement; assessment; language and communication; and culture. All responses were anonymous. Data on programme, year of study, age, sex and ethnicity were captured on a voluntary basis.Results In total, 34 staff members and 120 students from two different programmes participated in the survey, yielding a response rate of 87.17% for staff and 45.28% for students. A comparison showed that average student responses were lower compared with average staff responses. Of the 24 survey items, 17 showed significantly lower scores reported by minority ethnic (ME) students. ME students were, when compared with white counterparts, less likely to report that their programme included opportunities for group discussions about ethnicity and privilege. Similar comparisons of staff responses did not show significant differences between white and ME staff. Nevertheless, responses by staff and students across the board highlighted the need for further steps to improve the representation of ME groups in the curriculum.Conclusions This study provides useful insights into the perceptions and experiences of students and staff regarding the decolonisation of the dental curriculum in an undergraduate dental programme. Responses by the participants across the board identified several areas which could benefit from better representation of ME groups. Significant differences were noted between staff and student scores and also between white and ME students, indicating the latter group demonstrated more awareness regarding issues of representation. The findings underscore the need to take further steps to decolonise dental curricula.
目的 探讨学生和教职员工对口腔本科课程去殖民化的经验和看法。
方法 邀请参与者对口腔课程去殖民化的在线调查做出回应。目标人群包括当前攻读口腔外科学士和口腔治疗与保健学士课程的学生,以及英格兰西南部某大学的口腔医务人员。学生和员工版本的调查有六个共同主题:代表性;内容;同伴参与;评估;语言和沟通;以及文化。所有回复均为匿名。方案、学习年限、年龄、性别和种族等数据是自愿提供的。
结果 共有 34 名教职员工和来自两个不同课程的 120 名学生参与了调查,教职员工的回复率为 87.17%,学生的回复率为 45.28%。对比显示,少数民族(ME)学生的平均回复比平均员工回复要低。在 24 项调查项目中,有 17 项 ME 学生报告的分数明显较低。与白人相比,ME 学生报告他们的课程包括关于种族和特权的小组讨论机会的可能性较小。对员工回应的类似比较并没有显示出白人和 ME 员工之间的显著差异。然而,教职员工和学生的回应都强调需要采取进一步措施,以改善 ME 群体在课程中的代表性。
结论 本研究为学生和教职员工对口腔本科课程去殖民化的看法和经验提供了有用的见解。参与者的回应确定了几个可以从更好地代表 ME 群体中受益的领域。员工和学生的评分之间以及白人和 ME 学生之间都存在显著差异,表明后者对代表性问题的认识更为深刻。这些发现强调需要采取进一步措施去殖民化口腔课程。