Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 9;101(36):e30482. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030482.
We evaluated the diagnostic performance of both gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for focal liver lesions, especially for the detection of small (<2 cm) intrahepatic lesions. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI and CEUS before liver resection and compared Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI and CEUS in the detection of focal liver lesions. A total of 216 patients were included, and 309 lesions were found. The sensitivity values of MRI and CEUS for the main lesion were both more than 95%, and the coincidence rates were both more than 80%. Regarding lesions <2 cm, 135 such lesions were detected by MRI, whereas only 85 were detected by CEUS. For lesions <2 cm, the sensitivity, specificity, and coincidence rates of MRI were significantly better than those of CEUS. Among 27 patients, 50 more lesions were detected by MRI than CEUS, 56% (28/50) of which were malignant. For the large lesion, the diagnostic performance is similar between Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI and CEUS, and the sensitivity and coincidence rates of both methods are high. Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI is likely to detect small (<2 cm) focal intrahepatic lesions.
我们评估了钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像(Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI)和对比增强超声(CEUS)对肝脏局灶性病变的诊断性能,特别是对小(<2cm)肝内病变的检测。我们回顾性分析了行肝切除术前 Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI 和 CEUS 检查的患者,并比较了 Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI 和 CEUS 在肝脏局灶性病变检测中的表现。共纳入 216 例患者,共发现 309 个病灶。MRI 和 CEUS 对主病灶的敏感度均>95%,符合率均>80%。对于<2cm 的病灶,MRI 检出 135 个病灶,而 CEUS 仅检出 85 个病灶。对于<2cm 的病灶,MRI 的敏感度、特异度和符合率均明显优于 CEUS。在 27 例患者中,MRI 比 CEUS 多检出 50 个病灶,其中 56%(28/50)为恶性病灶。对于大病灶,Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI 和 CEUS 的诊断性能相似,两种方法的敏感度和符合率均较高。Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI 可能更有助于发现小(<2cm)的肝脏局灶性病变。