Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, CCM, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, CCM, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023 May;8(5):572-580. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.08.013. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
In bipolar disorder, impaired affective theory of mind (aToM) performance and aberrant neural activation in the ToM brain network partly explain social functioning impairments. However, it is not yet known whether psychotherapy of bipolar disorder influences neuroimaging markers of aToM.
In this study, conducted within the multicentric randomized controlled trial of the BipoLife consortium, patients with euthymic bipolar disorder underwent 2 group interventions over 6 months (mean = 28.45 weeks): 1) a specific, cognitive behavioral intervention (specific psychotherapeutic intervention [SEKT]) (n = 31) targeting impulse regulation, ToM, and social skills and 2) an emotion-focused intervention (FEST) (n = 28). To compare the effect of SEKT and FEST on neural correlates of aToM, patients performed an aToM task during functional magnetic resonance imaging before and after interventions (final functional magnetic resonance imaging sample of pre- and postcompleters, SEKT: n = 16; FEST: n = 17). Healthy control subjects (n = 32) were scanned twice with the same time interval. Because ToM was trained in SEKT, we expected an increased ToM network activation in SEKT relative to FEST postintervention.
Both treatments effectively stabilized patients' euthymic state in terms of affective symptoms, life satisfaction, and global functioning. Confirming our expectations, SEKT patients showed increased neural activation within regions of the ToM network, bilateral temporoparietal junction, posterior cingulate cortex, and precuneus, whereas FEST patients did not.
The stabilizing effect of SEKT on clinical outcomes went along with increased neural activation of the ToM network, while FEST possibly exerted its positive effect by other, yet unexplored routes.
在双相情感障碍中,情感理论思维(aToM)能力受损和 ToM 脑网络中的异常神经激活部分解释了社交功能障碍。然而,目前尚不清楚双相情感障碍的心理治疗是否会影响 aToM 的神经影像学标志物。
在 BipoLife 联合会的多中心随机对照试验中,进行了这项研究,处于缓解期的双相情感障碍患者接受了为期 6 个月的 2 种分组干预(平均 28.45 周):1)一种针对冲动控制、aToM 和社交技能的特定认知行为干预(特定心理治疗干预 [SEKT])(n=31);2)一种情绪聚焦干预(FEST)(n=28)。为了比较 SEKT 和 FEST 对 aToM 神经相关性的影响,患者在干预前后进行了功能磁共振成像(最终完成干预的预-后功能磁共振成像样本,SEKT:n=16;FEST:n=17)。健康对照组(n=32)在相同的时间间隔内进行了两次扫描。因为 aToM 在 SEKT 中进行了训练,我们预计 SEKT 干预后相对于 FEST,ToM 网络的激活会增加。
两种治疗方法都能有效地稳定患者的情感症状、生活满意度和整体功能。证实了我们的预期,SEKT 患者在 ToM 网络的双侧颞顶联合区、后扣带回和楔前叶等区域显示出更高的神经激活,而 FEST 患者则没有。
SEKT 对临床结果的稳定作用伴随着 ToM 网络的神经激活增加,而 FEST 可能通过其他尚未探索的途径发挥其积极作用。