Suppr超能文献

经导管二尖瓣置换术与传统再次二尖瓣手术治疗退行性二尖瓣瓣叶和瓣环病变的多中心注册研究。

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation versus conventional redo surgery for degenerated mitral valve prostheses and rings in a multicenter registry.

机构信息

Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, Asklepios Klinikum Harburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, MediClin Heart Center Coswig, Coswig (Anhalt), Germany.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Mar;167(3):957-964. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.07.032. Epub 2022 Aug 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Degeneration of mitral prostheses/rings may be treated by redo surgery, and, recently, by transcatheter valve-in-valve/ring implantation. This multicenter registry presents results of transcatheter valve-in-valve and repeat surgery for prostheses/rings degeneration.

METHODS

Data provided by 10 German heart centers underwent propensity score-matched retrospective analysis. The primary endpoint was 30-day/midterm mortality. Perioperative outcome was assessed according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. Further, the influence of moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR) on 30-day/midterm mortality was analyzed.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2019, 273 patients (79 transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve [TM-ViV] and 194 redo mitral valve replacement [Re-MVR]) underwent repeat procedure for mitral prosthesis/ring degeneration. Propensity score matching distinguished 79 patient pairs. European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II-predicted risk was 15.7 ± 13.7% in the TM-ViV group and 15.0% ± 12.7% in the Re-MVR group (P = .5336). TM-ViV patients were older (74.73 vs 72.2 years; P = .0030) and had higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (54 vs 40 patients; P = .0233). Severe TR incidence was similar (17.95% in TM-ViV vs 14.10%; P = .1741). Sixty-eight TM-ViV patients previously underwent mitral valve replacement, whereas 41 Re-MVR patients underwent valve repair (P < .0001). Stenosis was the leading degeneration mechanism in 42 TM-ViV versus 22 Re-MVR patients (P < .0005). The 30-day/midterm mortality did not differ between groups. Moderate or greater TR was a predictor of total (odds ratio [OR], 4.36; P = .0011), 30-day (OR, 3.76; P = .0180), and midterm mortality (OR, 4.30; P = .0378), irrespective of group.

CONCLUSIONS

In both groups, observed mortality was less than predicted. Redo surgery enabled treatment of concomitant conditions, such as atrial fibrillation or TR. TR was shown to be a predictor of total, 30-day, and midterm mortality in both groups.

摘要

目的

二尖瓣假体/环的退行性变可以通过再次手术治疗,最近也可以通过经导管瓣中瓣/环植入术治疗。该多中心登记研究报告了经导管瓣中瓣和再次手术治疗假体/环退行性变的结果。

方法

10 家德国心脏中心提供的数据进行了倾向评分匹配的回顾性分析。主要终点为 30 天/中期死亡率。根据二尖瓣学术研究联合会(Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium,MVARC)标准评估围手术期结果。此外,还分析了中度或重度三尖瓣反流(TR)对 30 天/中期死亡率的影响。

结果

2014 年至 2019 年间,273 例(79 例经导管二尖瓣瓣中瓣[TM-ViV]和 194 例再次二尖瓣置换术[Re-MVR])因二尖瓣假体/环退行性变接受了重复手术。倾向评分匹配区分了 79 对患者。TM-ViV 组的欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation,EuroSCORE)Ⅱ预测风险为 15.7±13.7%,Re-MVR 组为 15.0%±12.7%(P=0.5336)。TM-ViV 患者年龄更大(74.73 岁比 72.2 岁;P=0.0030),心房颤动发生率更高(54 例比 40 例;P=0.0233)。严重 TR 的发生率相似(TM-ViV 为 17.95%,Re-MVR 为 14.10%;P=0.1741)。68 例 TM-ViV 患者此前接受了二尖瓣置换术,而 41 例 Re-MVR 患者接受了瓣膜修复术(P<0.0001)。TM-ViV 组 42 例和 Re-MVR 组 22 例患者的主要退行性变机制为狭窄(P<0.0005)。30 天/中期死亡率在两组间无差异。中度或重度 TR 是总死亡率(优势比[OR],4.36;P=0.0011)、30 天死亡率(OR,3.76;P=0.0180)和中期死亡率(OR,4.30;P=0.0378)的预测因素,与组无关。

结论

两组的观察死亡率均低于预测死亡率。再次手术可治疗心房颤动或 TR 等合并症。TR 是两组总死亡率、30 天死亡率和中期死亡率的预测因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验