Suppr超能文献

提高临床药师进行药物审查的计算机决策支持系统的可用性和实用性:汇聚式、并行评估。

Improving the usability and usefulness of computerized decision support systems for medication review by clinical pharmacists: A convergent, parallel evaluation.

机构信息

Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS, Health Technology Assessment and Medical Practices, F-59000, Lille, France; Inserm, CIC-IT 1403, F-59000, Lille, France.

Inserm, CIC-IT 1403, F-59000, Lille, France.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Jan;19(1):144-154. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) help hospital-based clinical pharmacists to perform medication reviews and so are promising tools for improving medication safety. However, their poor usability can reduce effectiveness and acceptability.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the usability and perceived usefulness of a CDSS for medication review by hospital-based pharmacists and to draw up guidelines on improving its usability.

METHODS

We performed a convergent, parallel evaluation. Firstly, three researchers conducted a heuristic evaluation of the CDSS. Secondly, clinical pharmacists who use the CDSS filled out the Usefulness, Satisfaction and Ease of Use (USE) questionnaire. Lastly, semi-structured interviews with the pharmacists enabled us to understand their opinions and experiences. The results of the heuristic evaluation were used to identify potential improvements in the CDSS. We performed a statistical analysis of the USE questionnaire data. Interviews were analyzed based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), together with a task-technology fit model. The results generated by these three approaches were compared in order to determine convergences and divergences, identify challenges related to the usability and usefulness of the CDSS, and draw up guidelines for its improvement.

RESULTS

Forty-seven usability problems were discovered; they variously concerned the graphical user interface, the pharmacists' needs, and the medication review model implemented in the CDSS. Only the "usefulness" dimension of the USE was not scored positively. All the UTAUT dimensions and the task-technology fit dimension emerged in the interviews. Cross-comparisons of the results from the three approaches led to the identification of four challenges and the corresponding formulation of 23 guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines developed here should help to improve the design and acceptability of CDSSs. Hence, CDSSs will be able to assist clinical pharmacists more fully with their medication reviews and help to further improve patient safety.

摘要

背景

计算机化决策支持系统(CDSS)有助于医院临床药师进行药物审查,是提高药物安全性的有前途的工具。然而,其较差的可用性会降低其有效性和可接受性。

目的

评估基于医院的药剂师使用 CDSS 进行药物审查的可用性和感知有用性,并制定改善其可用性的指南。

方法

我们进行了收敛性、并行评估。首先,三位研究人员对 CDSS 进行了启发式评估。其次,使用 CDSS 的临床药师填写了有用性、满意度和易用性(USE)问卷。最后,对药师进行半结构化访谈,以了解他们的意见和经验。启发式评估的结果用于确定 CDSS 的潜在改进。我们对 USE 问卷数据进行了统计分析。根据统一技术接受和使用理论(UTAUT)以及任务-技术适配模型对访谈进行了分析。对这三种方法的结果进行了比较,以确定一致性和分歧,确定与 CDSS 的可用性和有用性相关的挑战,并制定改进指南。

结果

发现了 47 个可用性问题;它们分别涉及图形用户界面、药师的需求以及 CDSS 中实施的药物审查模型。只有 USE 的“有用性”维度没有得到积极评价。UTAUT 的所有维度和任务-技术适配维度都出现在访谈中。对三种方法的结果进行交叉比较,确定了四项挑战,并制定了 23 条指南。

结论

这里制定的指南应有助于改善 CDSS 的设计和可接受性。因此,CDSS 将能够更全面地帮助临床药师进行药物审查,并有助于进一步提高患者安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验