Flores Dalmacio D, Allen J Lloyd, Bannon Jacqueline A
J Pediatr Health Care. 2022 Nov-Dec;36(6):e7-e12. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
Debates questioning the soundness of inclusive elementary school discussions that acknowledge sexual and gender diverse people are harmful to gay, bisexual, or queer (GBQ) males. With parents as sexual socialization agents, examining sex communication at home is critical for promoting inclusive health information for all youth.
We examined how GBQ youth (n = 30), aged 15-20 years, conceptualized inclusive sex communication with parents and the value of open sexuality discussions.
Most of the sample identified as gay (76.7%) and diverse (13.3% Asian, 13.3% Black/African American, 33.3% Latino). Participants discussed sexual health with their parents and perceived its significance for GBQ, questioning, and heterosexual children.
Findings can inform interventions that promote inclusive sex communication between parents and children to promote acceptance of sexual and gender diversity and sexual health for all youth.
关于承认性取向和性别多样化人群的包容性小学讨论是否合理的辩论,对男同性恋、双性恋或酷儿(GBQ)男性有害。父母作为性社会化的推动者,研究家庭中的性交流对于为所有青少年推广包容性健康信息至关重要。
我们研究了15至20岁的GBQ青年(n = 30)如何将与父母的包容性性交流概念化,以及开放性取向讨论的价值。
大多数样本被认定为同性恋(76.7%),还有不同种族的(13.3%为亚裔,13.3%为黑人/非裔美国人,33.3%为拉丁裔)。参与者与他们的父母讨论了性健康,并认识到其对GBQ、有疑问的以及异性恋孩子的重要性。
研究结果可为干预措施提供参考,这些措施旨在促进父母与孩子之间的包容性性交流,以促进对所有青少年的性取向和性别多样性的接纳以及性健康。