Baams Laura, Dubas Judith Semon, van Aken Marcel A G
Developmental Psychology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, Utrecht, 3584CS, Netherlands.
Population Research Center, Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 23rd Street Stop G1800, Austin, TX, 78712-1699, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 May;46(5):931-942. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0638-z. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
Comprehensive sexuality education and sexuality education that is inclusive to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ) youth is thought to educate and support youth in their social relations. Despite the obligation for Dutch schools to cover sexuality education in their curricula, including the topic of sexual diversity, the content that is covered varies widely across schools. With the current study, we present an overview of the content of sexuality education as reported by a sample of 601 Dutch adolescents (58.4% female youth) from six different high schools (e.g., public, Roman Catholic, protestant, anthroposophical; grades 10-12). Further, we examine whether the content or extensiveness of sexuality education at the beginning of the school year is related to a decrease in LGBTQ name-calling and an increase in the willingness to intervene when witnessing LGBTQ name-calling at the end of the school year. Adolescents completed three surveys, spaced four months apart. The results show that anatomy, STI prevention, and relationships are covered most often in sexuality education, with less attention to sexual diversity. Our longitudinal findings show that having a wide variety of topics covered in sexuality education-not just sexual diversity-was related to an increase in perceived willingness to intervene when witnessing LGBTQ name-calling by teachers or school staff, fellow students, and youth themselves (female youth). It also predicted a decrease in the occurrence of name-calling according to females. Our findings emphasize the importance of having comprehensive sexuality education in schools; it not only educates and empowers youth but also signals a safer school climate.
全面性教育以及对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿和疑问者(LGBTQ)青少年具有包容性的性教育,被认为能够在社交关系方面对青少年进行教育并提供支持。尽管荷兰学校有义务在课程中纳入性教育,包括性取向多元化这一主题,但不同学校所涵盖的内容差异很大。通过本研究,我们概述了来自六所不同高中(如公立、罗马天主教、新教、人智学;10至12年级)的601名荷兰青少年(58.4%为女性)样本所报告的性教育内容。此外,我们还研究了学年开始时性教育的内容或广度是否与学年结束时LGBTQ辱骂行为的减少以及目睹LGBTQ辱骂行为时进行干预的意愿增加有关。青少年完成了三项间隔四个月的调查。结果表明,性教育中最常涉及的内容是解剖学、性传播感染预防和人际关系,而对性取向多元化的关注较少。我们的纵向研究结果表明,性教育涵盖广泛的主题——而不仅仅是性取向多元化——与教师、学校工作人员、同学和青少年自身(女性青少年)目睹LGBTQ辱骂行为时感知到的干预意愿增加有关。根据女性的报告,这也预示着辱骂行为的减少。我们的研究结果强调了在学校开展全面性教育的重要性;它不仅能教育和赋能青少年,还能营造更安全的校园氛围。