Suppr超能文献

血管再充盈系数不能作为血液透析患者全身毛细血管水力传导性的良好标志物:来自模拟研究的新认识。

Vascular refilling coefficient is not a good marker of whole-body capillary hydraulic conductivity in hemodialysis patients: insights from a simulation study.

机构信息

Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.

Division of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 10;12(1):15277. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16826-8.

Abstract

Refilling of the vascular space through absorption of interstitial fluid by micro vessels is a crucial mechanism for maintaining hemodynamic stability during hemodialysis (HD) and allowing excess fluid to be removed from body tissues. The rate of vascular refilling depends on the imbalance between the Starling forces acting across the capillary walls as well as on their hydraulic conductivity and total surface area. Various approaches have been proposed to assess the vascular refilling process during HD, including the so-called refilling coefficient (Kr) that describes the rate of vascular refilling per changes in plasma oncotic pressure, assuming that other Starling forces and the flow of lymph remain constant during HD. Several studies have shown that Kr decreases exponentially during HD, which was attributed to a dialysis-induced decrease in the whole-body capillary hydraulic conductivity (LS). Here, we employ a lumped-parameter mathematical model of the cardiovascular system and water and solute transport between the main body fluid compartments to assess the impact of all Starling forces and the flow of lymph on vascular refilling during HD in order to explain the reasons behind the observed intradialytic decrease in Kr. We simulated several HD sessions in a virtual patient with different blood priming procedures, ultrafiltration rates, session durations, and constant or variable levels of LS. We show that the intradialytic decrease in Kr is not associated with a possible reduction of LS but results from the inherent assumption that plasma oncotic pressure is the only variable Starling force during HD, whereas in fact other Starling forces, in particular the oncotic pressure of the interstitial fluid, have an important impact on the transcapillary fluid exchange during HD. We conclude that Kr is not a good marker of LS and should not be used to guide fluid removal during HD or to assess the fluid status of dialysis patients.

摘要

微血管吸收间质液来填充血管空间是血液透析(HD)过程中维持血液动力学稳定并将多余液体从组织中去除的关键机制。血管再充盈的速度取决于作用于毛细血管壁的Starling 力之间的不平衡,以及它们的水力传导性和总表面积。已经提出了各种方法来评估 HD 期间的血管再充盈过程,包括所谓的再充盈系数(Kr),它描述了每单位血浆胶体渗透压变化时的血管再充盈速度,假设在 HD 期间其他 Starling 力和淋巴液的流动保持不变。多项研究表明,Kr 在 HD 过程中呈指数下降,这归因于透析引起的全身毛细血管水力传导性(LS)降低。在这里,我们使用心血管系统和主体液腔之间的水和溶质传输的集中参数数学模型来评估所有 Starling 力和淋巴液流动对 HD 期间血管再充盈的影响,以解释观察到的 Kr 透析期间下降的原因。我们在具有不同血液预充程序、超滤率、治疗时间和 LS 恒定或可变水平的虚拟患者中模拟了几次 HD 治疗。我们表明,Kr 的透析期间下降与 LS 可能降低无关,而是由于在 HD 期间血浆胶体渗透压是唯一可变的 Starling 力的固有假设,而实际上其他 Starling 力,特别是间质液的胶体渗透压,对 HD 期间跨毛细血管液体交换有重要影响。我们得出结论,Kr 不是 LS 的良好标志物,不应用于指导 HD 期间的液体去除或评估透析患者的液体状态。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3e3/9464211/cbb4481e2a4e/41598_2022_16826_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验