• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中心网站上的帖子需要较少的创意才能引起注意。

Posts on central websites need less originality to be noticed.

机构信息

CS Department, ITU Copenhagen, Rued Langgaards Vej 7, Copenhagen, Denmark.

PS Department, Copenhagen University, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 10;12(1):15265. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19433-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-19433-9
PMID:36088489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9464218/
Abstract

Information has major consequences for democracy and society. It is important to understand what factors favor its diffusion. The impact of the content of a message on its likelihood of going viral is poorly understood. Some studies say originality is important for a message not to be overlooked. Others give more relevance to paratextual elements-network centrality, timing, human cognitive limits. Here we propose that originality and centrality interact in a nontrivial way, which might explain why originality by itself is not a good predictor of success. We collected data from Reddit on users sharing hyperlinks. We estimated the originality of each post title and the centrality of the website hosting the shared link. We show that the interaction effect exists: if users share content from a central website, originality no longer increases the odds of receiving at least one upvote. The same is not true for the odds of becoming one of the top 10% scoring posts. We show that originality is concentrated in the domain network: domains in the core of the network produce more original content. Our results imply that research on online information virality needs to take into account the nontrivial interaction between originality and prominence.

摘要

信息对民主和社会具有重大影响。了解哪些因素有利于信息的传播非常重要。信息内容对其传播概率的影响还不太清楚。一些研究表明,信息的新颖性对于不被忽视很重要。另一些研究则更关注超文本元素——网络中心性、时间、人类认知极限。在这里,我们提出新颖性和中心性以一种非平凡的方式相互作用,这可能解释了为什么新颖性本身并不是成功的良好预测指标。我们从 Reddit 上收集了用户分享超链接的数据。我们估计了每个帖子标题的新颖性和共享链接所在网站的中心性。我们表明,这种交互效应确实存在:如果用户从中心网站分享内容,新颖性不再增加获得至少一个点赞的几率。但是,对于成为评分最高的前 10%帖子的几率,情况并非如此。我们表明,新颖性集中在域网络中:网络核心中的域产生更多原创内容。我们的结果表明,在线信息传播研究需要考虑新颖性和突出性之间的非平凡相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a74/9464218/64f3a7fe0cb9/41598_2022_19433_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a74/9464218/1d6864b99423/41598_2022_19433_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a74/9464218/64f3a7fe0cb9/41598_2022_19433_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a74/9464218/1d6864b99423/41598_2022_19433_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a74/9464218/64f3a7fe0cb9/41598_2022_19433_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Posts on central websites need less originality to be noticed.中心网站上的帖子需要较少的创意才能引起注意。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 10;12(1):15265. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19433-9.
2
A Decision Tree Based Methodology for Evaluating Creativity in Engineering Design.一种基于决策树的工程设计创造力评估方法。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 25;10:32. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00032. eCollection 2019.
3
Modifying Sensory Afferences on Tablet Changes Originality in Drawings.平板电脑上改变感觉传入会影响绘画的原创性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 14;13:806093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806093. eCollection 2022.
4
Generating original ideas: The neural underpinning of originality.产生原创想法:原创性的神经基础。
Neuroimage. 2015 Aug 1;116:232-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.030. Epub 2015 May 20.
5
Understanding ideational fluency as a survival process.理解意念流畅性是一种生存过程。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2022 Jun;92(2):e12469. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12469. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
6
Originality of divergent thinking is associated with working memory-related brain activity: Evidence from a large sample study.发散思维的原创性与工作记忆相关的大脑活动有关:来自大样本研究的证据。
Neuroimage. 2020 Aug 1;216:116825. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116825. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
7
Domain-Specificity of Creativity: A Study on the Relationship Between Visual Creativity and Visual Mental Imagery.创造力的领域特异性:关于视觉创造力与视觉心理意象之间关系的研究。
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 1;6:1870. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01870. eCollection 2015.
8
Predication of Writing Originality Based on Computational Linguistics.基于计算语言学的写作原创性预测
J Intell. 2022 Dec 13;10(4):124. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040124.
9
Predicting response originality through brain activity: An analysis of changes in EEG alpha power during the generation of alternative ideas.通过大脑活动预测反应的新颖性:对产生替代想法过程中 EEG 阿尔法波功率变化的分析。
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 15;207:116385. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116385. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
10
Evaluating the predictive validity of four divergent thinking tasks for the originality of design product ideation.评估四项发散思维任务对设计产品创意原创性的预测效度。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 14;17(3):e0265116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265116. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing information diffusion mechanisms by matching on cascade size.通过匹配级联大小来比较信息扩散机制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 16;118(46). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100786118.
2
How do sentiments affect virality on Twitter?情绪如何影响推特上的传播性?
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Apr 14;8(4):201756. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201756.
3
FakeNewsNet: A Data Repository with News Content, Social Context, and Spatiotemporal Information for Studying Fake News on Social Media.假新闻网:一个具有新闻内容、社交背景和时空信息的数据资源库,用于研究社交媒体上的假新闻。
Big Data. 2020 Jun;8(3):171-188. doi: 10.1089/big.2020.0062.
4
Diffusion size and structural virality: The effects of message and network features on spreading health information on twitter.传播规模与结构病毒性:信息和网络特征对推特上健康信息传播的影响。
Comput Human Behav. 2018 Dec;89:111-120. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.039. Epub 2018 Jul 28.
5
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook.远低于你的想象:脸书上虚假新闻传播的流行程度和预测因素。
Sci Adv. 2019 Jan 9;5(1):eaau4586. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586. eCollection 2019 Jan.
6
The spread of low-credibility content by social bots.社交机器人传播低可信度内容。
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 20;9(1):4787. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7.
7
Quantifying reputation and success in art.量化艺术中的声誉和成功。
Science. 2018 Nov 16;362(6416):825-829. doi: 10.1126/science.aau7224. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
8
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
9
The science of fake news.假新闻的科学。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1094-1096. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
10
Science of science.科学学。
Science. 2018 Mar 2;359(6379). doi: 10.1126/science.aao0185.