• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远低于你的想象:脸书上虚假新闻传播的流行程度和预测因素。

Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook.

机构信息

Department of Politics and Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, Fisher Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

Wilf Family Department of Politics and Social Media and Political Participation (SMaPP) Lab, New York University, 19 West 4th Street, New York, NY 10012, USA.

出版信息

Sci Adv. 2019 Jan 9;5(1):eaau4586. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586. eCollection 2019 Jan.

DOI:10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
PMID:30662946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6326755/
Abstract

So-called "fake news" has renewed concerns about the prevalence and effects of misinformation in political campaigns. Given the potential for widespread dissemination of this material, we examine the individual-level characteristics associated with sharing false articles during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. To do so, we uniquely link an original survey with respondents' sharing activity as recorded in Facebook profile data. First and foremost, we find that sharing this content was a relatively rare activity. Conservatives were more likely to share articles from fake news domains, which in 2016 were largely pro-Trump in orientation, than liberals or moderates. We also find a strong age effect, which persists after controlling for partisanship and ideology: On average, users over 65 shared nearly seven times as many articles from fake news domains as the youngest age group.

摘要

所谓的“假新闻”再次引发了人们对政治运动中错误信息普遍存在和影响的担忧。鉴于这种材料可能广泛传播,我们研究了与分享 2016 年美国总统竞选期间虚假文章相关的个人特征。为此,我们将原始调查与受访者在 Facebook 个人资料数据中记录的分享活动进行了独特的关联。首先,我们发现分享这些内容是一种相对较少见的活动。保守派比自由派或温和派更有可能分享来自假新闻网站的文章,而这些网站在 2016 年主要倾向于支持特朗普。我们还发现了一个强烈的年龄效应,即使在控制党派和意识形态之后,这种效应仍然存在:平均而言,65 岁以上的用户分享假新闻网站文章的次数是最年轻年龄组的近七倍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b759/6326755/766fad6f8e3c/aau4586-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b759/6326755/6bee2e65a98f/aau4586-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b759/6326755/766fad6f8e3c/aau4586-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b759/6326755/6bee2e65a98f/aau4586-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b759/6326755/766fad6f8e3c/aau4586-F2.jpg

相似文献

1
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook.远低于你的想象:脸书上虚假新闻传播的流行程度和预测因素。
Sci Adv. 2019 Jan 9;5(1):eaau4586. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586. eCollection 2019 Jan.
2
Of pandemics, politics, and personality: The role of conscientiousness and political ideology in the sharing of fake news.论大流行病、政治和人格:尽责性和政治意识形态在假新闻传播中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 May;151(5):1154-1177. doi: 10.1037/xge0001120. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
3
Conscientiousness does not moderate the association between political ideology and susceptibility to fake news sharing.尽责性并不调节政治意识形态与易受虚假新闻分享影响之间的关联。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Nov;152(11):3277-3284. doi: 10.1037/xge0001467. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
4
Everyday non-partisan fake news: Sharing behavior, platform specificity, and detection.日常无党派虚假新闻:分享行为、平台特性与检测
Front Psychol. 2023 May 15;14:1118407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1118407. eCollection 2023.
5
Character deprecation in fake news: Is it in supply or demand?假新闻中的人物贬低:是供应问题还是需求问题?
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2021 Jun;24(4):624-637. doi: 10.1177/1368430220965709. Epub 2021 May 31.
6
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.2016年美国总统大选期间推特上的假新闻。
Science. 2019 Jan 25;363(6425):374-378. doi: 10.1126/science.aau2706.
7
Fake news and COVID-19: modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users.假新闻与新冠疫情:社交媒体用户间假新闻分享预测因素的建模分析
Telemat Inform. 2021 Jan;56:101475. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101475. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
8
Social Psychological Predictors of Belief in Fake News in the Run-Up to the 2019 Hungarian Elections: The Importance of Conspiracy Mentality Supports the Notion of Ideological Symmetry in Fake News Belief.2019年匈牙利大选前夕假新闻信念的社会心理预测因素:阴谋心态的重要性支持了假新闻信念中意识形态对称性的观点。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 24;12:790848. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790848. eCollection 2021.
9
Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation.转发谣言:纠正错误信息失败中的意识形态不对称。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jan;50(1):3-17. doi: 10.1177/01461672221114222. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
10
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election.2016 年美国大选中的不可信网站曝光。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):472-480. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
AI-driven disinformation: policy recommendations for democratic resilience.人工智能驱动的虚假信息:增强民主韧性的政策建议
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Jul 31;8:1569115. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1569115. eCollection 2025.
2
Global vaccine confidence trends among adults above and below age 65.65岁及以上和65岁以下成年人的全球疫苗信心趋势。
NPJ Vaccines. 2025 Jul 21;10(1):160. doi: 10.1038/s41541-025-01217-7.
3
Lying to an older adult in a sharing situation: differences between young and mid-life adults.在分享情境中对老年人说谎:年轻人与中年人的差异。

本文引用的文献

1
Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news.先前的接触会增加对假新闻的感知准确性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Dec;147(12):1865-1880. doi: 10.1037/xge0000465. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
2
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
3
The science of fake news.假新闻的科学。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1541248. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1541248. eCollection 2025.
4
Motivations to connect with like-minded audiences increase partisan sharing on social media.与志同道合的受众建立联系的动机增加了社交媒体上的党派性分享。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Jun 14;4(7):pgaf197. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf197. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
Beyond Isolation: Social Media as a Bridge to Well-Being in Old Age.超越孤立:社交媒体作为老年幸福生活的桥梁
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 31;22(6):882. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060882.
6
Using co-sharing to identify use of mainstream news for promoting potentially misleading narratives.利用共同分享来识别主流新闻在传播潜在误导性叙事方面的用途。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02223-4.
7
Perceptions of Executive Decision Makers on Using Social Media in Effective Health Communication: Qualitative Study.行政决策者对社交媒体在有效健康传播中应用的认知:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 21;27:e69269. doi: 10.2196/69269.
8
Promoting engagement with social fact-checks online: Investigating the roles of social connection and shared partisanship.促进在线社交事实核查的参与度:探究社会联系和党派认同的作用。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 31;20(3):e0319336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319336. eCollection 2025.
9
The development of media truth discernment and fake news detection is related to the development of reasoning during adolescence.媒体真相辨别和假新闻检测的发展与青少年时期推理能力的发展有关。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):6854. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90427-z.
10
A Survey on the Criteria Used to Judge (Fake) News in Italian Population.意大利民众对(假)新闻判断标准的调查。
Brain Behav. 2025 Feb;15(2):e70315. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70315.
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1094-1096. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
4
The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information.熟悉度在纠正不准确信息方面的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Dec;43(12):1948-1961. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000422. Epub 2017 May 15.
5
Political science. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook.政治学。在 Facebook 上接触意识形态多样的新闻和观点。
Science. 2015 Jun 5;348(6239):1130-2. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1160. Epub 2015 May 7.
6
Source memory in older adults: an encoding or retrieval problem?老年人的源记忆:是编码问题还是检索问题?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Sep;27(5):1131-46. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1131.