Suppr超能文献

对比增强脂肪抑制 T1-3D-VIBE 与 T1-TSE MRI 在评估肛瘘中的对比研究。

Comparison of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-3D-VIBE and T1-TSE MRI in evaluating anal fistula.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 528 Zhang-heng Road, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China.

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Nov;47(11):3688-3697. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03661-8. Epub 2022 Sep 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced (CE) fat-suppressed three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted imaging with volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (FS-T1-3D-VIBE) and fat-suppressed T1-weighted turbo spin echo (FS-T1-TSE) sequence in characteristics of anal fistula.

METHODS

One hundred and two patients underwent perianal CE-MRI examination on a 3T scanner including FS-T1-3D-VIBE and FS-T1-TSE sequences before surgery. The performance of each sequence was evaluated in terms of fistula classification, clarity of internal opening, number and position of internal openings including the distance between internal opening and anal verge, presence of secondary tracts and blind-ending sinus tracts. MRI findings were compared with surgical findings. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of fistula, gluteus maximus, and subcutaneous fat were compared between CE FS-T1-TSE and CE FS-T1-3D-VIBE.

RESULTS

Compared with CE FS-T1-TSE, CE FS-T1-3D-VIBE displayed more accurate in secondary tract, lithotomy position of the internal opening and the distance between internal opening and anal verge (P < 0.05). CE FS-T1-3D-VIBE was found superior to CE FS-T1-TSE in the clarity of the internal openings and in the diagnostic accuracy of blind-ending sinus tracts and complex fistulas in Standard Practice Task Force classification (P < 0.05). CE FS-T1-3D-VIBE achieved higher SNRs and CNRs in fistula and gluteus maximus than CE FS-T1-TSE (P ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CE-MRI of FS-T1-3D-VIBE might be a more valuable noninvasive technique than FS-T1-TSE to evaluate the anal fistula on evaluating the lithotomy position of internal opening, distance between internal opening and anal verge, clarity of internal opening, secondary tract, blind-ending sinus tract and classification of the complex fistula. The trial registration number for this prospective trial was Chi-TR1800020206 and the trial registration date was December 20, 2018.

摘要

目的

评估对比增强(CE)脂肪抑制三维(3D)T1 加权成像容积内插屏气检查(FS-T1-3D-VIBE)和脂肪抑制 T1 加权涡轮自旋回波(FS-T1-TSE)序列在肛瘘特征中的准确性。

方法

102 例患者在术前于 3T 扫描仪上进行肛周 CE-MRI 检查,包括 FS-T1-3D-VIBE 和 FS-T1-TSE 序列。评估每个序列在肛瘘分类、内口清晰度、内口数量和位置(包括内口与肛门缘的距离)、二级瘘管和盲端窦道的存在方面的表现。将 MRI 结果与手术结果进行比较。比较了瘘管、臀大肌和皮下脂肪的信号噪声比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)在 CE FS-T1-TSE 和 CE FS-T1-3D-VIBE 之间的差异。

结果

与 CE FS-T1-TSE 相比,CE FS-T1-3D-VIBE 在二级瘘管、截石位内口和内口与肛门缘的距离方面显示出更准确的结果(P<0.05)。CE FS-T1-3D-VIBE 在评估盲端窦道和复杂肛瘘的内口清晰度以及在 Standard Practice Task Force 分类中的诊断准确性方面优于 CE FS-T1-TSE(P<0.05)。CE FS-T1-3D-VIBE 在瘘管和臀大肌中获得的 SNR 和 CNR 均高于 CE FS-T1-TSE(P≤0.001)。

结论

CE-MRI 的 FS-T1-3D-VIBE 可能是一种比 FS-T1-TSE 更有价值的非侵入性技术,可用于评估肛门内口的截石位、内口与肛门缘的距离、内口清晰度、二级瘘管、盲端窦道和复杂肛瘘的分类。这项前瞻性试验的注册号为 Chi-TR1800020206,试验注册日期为 2018 年 12 月 20 日。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验