Suppr超能文献

改良式运动员肩部测试:一种新的场外评估工具的可靠性和有效性。

The Modified-Athletic Shoulder Test: Reliability and validity of a new on-field assessment tool.

机构信息

LAM - Motion Lab, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

LAM - Motion Lab, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

出版信息

Phys Ther Sport. 2022 Nov;58:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the reliability and the validity of a modified version of the Athletic Shoulder Test (M-AST), using a handheld dynamometer instead of a force plate.

DESIGN

Test-retest reliability and concordance between tools.

SETTING

University Motion Lab.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty healthy volunteers who practiced an upper limb sport for at least 5 h per week were recruited for the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The concordance between the Athletic Shoulder Test (AST) and the Modified-Athletic Shoulder Test (M-AST) was assessed with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), paired T-Test and Bland-Altman plots. The inter-session reliability was assessed with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), SEM, MDC and paired T-Test.

RESULTS

A strong concordance was found between AST and M-AST values (ICC = 0.86-0.97; p > 0.05) in all the positions considered and for both sessions. Bland-Altman plots confirmed these results. However, the inter-session reliability was more variable for both AST and M-AST (ICC = 0.643-0.923; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The M-AST seems to be a reliable, cheaper and easier to implement alternative to the AST to measure recovery status following matches or training sessions in upper limb athletes. As for the AST, familiarization trials will have to be performed before the assessment to have accurate measurements.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05112380.

摘要

目的

使用手持测力计代替力板评估改良版运动肩测试(M-AST)的可靠性和有效性。

设计

测试-重测可靠性和工具间的一致性。

地点

大学运动实验室。

参与者

招募了 20 名每周至少进行 5 小时上肢运动的健康志愿者参加研究。

主要观察指标

采用组内相关系数(ICC)、配对 t 检验和 Bland-Altman 图评估运动肩测试(AST)和改良运动肩测试(M-AST)之间的一致性。采用组内相关系数(ICC)、SEM、MDC 和配对 t 检验评估组间的可靠性。

结果

在考虑的所有位置和两个测试时段中,AST 和 M-AST 值之间均存在很强的一致性(ICC 为 0.86-0.97;p>0.05)。Bland-Altman 图证实了这些结果。然而,AST 和 M-AST 的组间可靠性变化更大(ICC 为 0.643-0.923;p<0.05)。

结论

M-AST 似乎是一种可靠、更经济且更容易实施的替代 AST 的方法,可用于测量上肢运动员比赛或训练后的恢复状态。与 AST 一样,在评估之前需要进行预适应试验以获得准确的测量结果。

临床试验注册号

NCT05112380。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验