Ling Lowell, Mui Oliver Oi Yat, Laupland Kevin B, Lefrant Jean-Yves, Roberts Jason A, Gopalan Pragasan Dean, Lipman Jeffrey, Joynt Gavin M
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
J Intensive Care. 2022 Sep 11;10(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40560-022-00633-4.
Up to 11% of critically ill patients with sepsis have an unknown source, where the pathogen and site of infection are unclear. The aim of this scoping review is to document currently reported diagnostic criteria of sepsis of unknown origin (SUO) and identify the types and breadth of existing evidence supporting diagnostic processes to identify the infection source in critically ill patients with suspected SUO.
A literature search of Embase, MEDLINE and PubMed for published studies from 1910 to August 19, 2021 addressing the topic of SUO was performed. Study type, country of origin according to World Bank classification, diagnostic criteria of sepsis of unknown origin, and investigative approaches were extracted from the studies.
From an initial 722 studies, 89 unique publications fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included for full text review. The most common publication type was case report/series 45/89 (51%). Only 10/89 (11%) of studies provided a diagnostic criteria of SUO, but a universally accepted diagnostic criterion was not identified. The included studies discussed 30/89 (34%) history, 23/89 (26%) examination, 57/89 (64%) imaging, microbiology 39/89 (44%), and special tests 32/89 (36%) as part of the diagnostic processes in patients with SUO.
Universally accepted diagnostic criteria for SUO was not found. Prospective studies on investigative processes in critically ill patients managed as SUO across different healthcare settings are needed to understand the epidemiology and inform the diagnostic criteria required to diagnose SUO.
高达11%的重症脓毒症患者感染源不明,即病原体和感染部位不清楚。本范围综述的目的是记录目前报道的不明原因脓毒症(SUO)的诊断标准,并确定支持诊断过程以识别疑似SUO的重症患者感染源的现有证据的类型和广度。
对Embase、MEDLINE和PubMed进行文献检索,以查找1910年至2021年8月19日发表的关于SUO主题的研究。从研究中提取研究类型、根据世界银行分类的原产国、不明原因脓毒症的诊断标准以及调查方法。
从最初的722项研究中,89篇独特的出版物符合纳入和排除标准,并被纳入全文审查。最常见的出版物类型是病例报告/系列45/89(51%)。只有10/89(11%)的研究提供了SUO的诊断标准,但未确定普遍接受的诊断标准。纳入的研究讨论了30/89(34%)病史、23/89(26%)检查、57/89(64%)影像学、微生物学39/89(44%)以及特殊检查32/89(36%)作为SUO患者诊断过程的一部分。
未找到SUO的普遍接受的诊断标准。需要对不同医疗环境中作为SUO管理的重症患者的调查过程进行前瞻性研究,以了解流行病学情况并为诊断SUO所需的诊断标准提供依据。