Rootjes Paul A, Chaara Sabrine, de Roij van Zuijdewijn Camiel L M, Nubé Menso J, Wijngaarden Gertrude, Grooteman Muriel P C
Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Kidney Int Rep. 2022 Jul 14;7(9):1980-1990. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.06.021. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Compared to standard hemodialysis (S-HD), postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) has been associated with improved survival.
To assess whether intradialytic hemodynamics may play a role in this respect, 40 chronic dialysis patients were cross-over randomized to S-HD (dialysate temperature [Td] 36.5 °C), cooled HD (C-HD; Td 35.5 °C), and HDF (low-volume [LV-HDF)] and high-volume [HV-HDF], both Td 36.5 °C, convection volume 15 liters, and at least 23 liters per session, respectively), each for 2 weeks. Blood pressure (BP) was measured every 15 minutes. The primary endpoint was the number of intradialytic hypotensive (IDH) episodes per session. IDH was defined as systolic BP (SBP) less than 90 mmHg for predialysis SBP less than 160 mmHg and less than 100 mmHg for predialysis SBP greater than or equal to 160 mmHg, independent of symptoms and interventions. A analysis on early-onset IDH was performed as well. Secondary endpoints included intradialytic courses of SBP, diastolic BP (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP).
During S-HD, IDH occurred 0.68 episodes per session, which was 3.2 and 2.5 times higher than during C-HD (0.21 per session, < 0.0005) and HV-HDF (0.27 per session, < 0.0005), respectively. Whereas the latter 2 strategies showed similar frequencies, HV-HDF differed significantly from LV-HDF ( = 0.02). A comparable trend was observed for early-onset IDH: S-HD (0.32 per session), C-HD (0.07 per session, < 0.0005) and HV-HDF (0.10 per session, = 0.001). SBP, DBP, and MAP declined during S-HD (-6.8, -5.2, -5.2 mmHg per session; = 0.004, < 0.0005, = 0.002 respectively), which was markedly different from C-HD ( < 0.01).
Though C-HD and HV-HDF showed the lowest IDH frequency and the best intradialytic hemodynamic stability, all parameters were most disrupted in S-HD. Therefore, the survival benefit of HV-HDF over S-HD may be partly caused by a more beneficial intradialytic BP profile.
与标准血液透析(S-HD)相比,后置稀释血液透析滤过(HDF)与生存率提高相关。
为评估透析过程中的血流动力学是否在此方面起作用,40例慢性透析患者交叉随机分组,分别接受S-HD(透析液温度[Td]36.5°C)、低温血液透析(C-HD;Td 35.5°C)以及HDF(低容量[LV-HDF]和高容量[HV-HDF],两者Td均为36.5°C,对流容量分别为15升和每次治疗至少23升),每种治疗为期2周。每15分钟测量一次血压(BP)。主要终点是每次治疗中透析过程中低血压(IDH)发作的次数。IDH定义为:透析前收缩压(SBP)低于160 mmHg时,收缩压低于90 mmHg;透析前SBP大于或等于160 mmHg时,收缩压低于100 mmHg,与症状和干预措施无关。同时对早发性IDH进行了分析。次要终点包括透析过程中SBP、舒张压(DBP)和平均动脉压(MAP)的变化过程。
在S-HD期间,每次治疗IDH发作0.68次,分别比C-HD(每次治疗0.21次,<0.0005)和HV-HDF(每次治疗0.27次,<0.0005)高3.2倍和2.5倍。后两种策略显示出相似的频率,但HV-HDF与LV-HDF有显著差异(=0.02)。早发性IDH也观察到类似趋势:S-HD(每次治疗0.32次)、C-HD(每次治疗0.07次,<0.0005)和HV-HDF(每次治疗0.10次,=0.001)。S-HD期间SBP、DBP和MAP下降(每次治疗分别为-6.8、-5.2、-5.2 mmHg;分别为=0.004,<0.0005,=0.002),这与C-HD明显不同(<0.01)。
尽管C-HD和HV-HDF显示出最低的IDH频率和最佳的透析过程血流动力学稳定性,但所有参数在S-HD中受到的干扰最大。因此,HV-HDF相对于S-HD的生存益处可能部分归因于更有益的透析过程血压曲线。