Liu Peiyun, Rootjes Paul A, de Roij van Zuijdewijn Camiel L M, Hau Chi M, Nubé Menso J, Nieuwland Rienk, Wijngaarden Gertrude, Grooteman Muriel P C
Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Apr 29;17(6):sfae134. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae134. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and subsequent tissue damage may contribute to the poor outcome of chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients. While the IDH-incidence is lower in high-volume haemodiafiltration (HV-HDF) than in standard HD (S-HD), survival is better in HV-HDF. Tissue injury, as measured by extracellular vesicle (EV)-release, was compared between four modalities.
Forty chronic patients were cross-over randomized to S-HD, cool-HD (C-HD), low-volume HDF (LV-HDF), and HV-HDF. Blood pressure was recorded every 15 minutes. EVs from circulating blood-cell-elements (bio-incompatibility-related) and cardiovascular (CV) tissues (CV-related), were measured before and after dialysis. The influence of modalities and IDH on the rate of change of EVs was assessed. Both crude and haemoconcentration-adjusted analyses were performed.
Leukocyte and erythrocyte-derived EVs increased in all modalities. Platelet-derived EVs increased more in LV-HDF and HV-HDF (68.4 respectively 56.1 × 10/ml) than in S-HD (27.5 × 10/ml), values for interaction were <.01 respectively .06. Endothelial-derived CD144 (2.3 × 10/ml in HV-HDF and 9.8 × 10/ml in S-HD) and cardiomyocyte-derived Connexin-43 (12.0 respectively 31.9 × 10/ml) EVs increased less in HV-HDF than in S-HD ( for interaction .03 respectively .06). Correction for haemoconcentration attenuated all changes, although the increase in platelet-derived EVs remained significant in LV-HDF and HV-HDF, and CD144 and Connexin-43 EVs increased most in S-HD. EV release was similar in patients with varying IDH susceptibility and in sessions with and without IDH.
Most EVs increase during HD and HDF. Regarding platelet-derived EVs, HDF appears less biocompatible than HD. Considering CV-related EVs, tissue injury seems less pronounced in HV-HDF. The finding that EV release is IDH-independent needs confirmation.
透析中低血压(IDH)及随后的组织损伤可能导致慢性血液透析(HD)患者预后不良。虽然高容量血液透析滤过(HV-HDF)的IDH发生率低于标准HD(S-HD),但HV-HDF患者的生存率更高。比较了四种透析方式下通过细胞外囊泡(EV)释放来衡量的组织损伤情况。
40例慢性患者交叉随机分组至S-HD、低温HD(C-HD)、低容量血液透析滤过(LV-HDF)和HV-HDF组。每15分钟记录一次血压。在透析前后测量循环血细胞成分(与生物不相容性相关)和心血管(CV)组织(与CV相关)的EV。评估透析方式和IDH对EV变化率的影响。进行了粗分析和血液浓缩校正分析。
所有透析方式下白细胞和红细胞来源的EV均增加。LV-HDF和HV-HDF中血小板来源的EV增加幅度(分别为68.4和56.1×10/ml)大于S-HD(27.5×10/ml),交互作用值分别为<.01和.06。内皮来源的CD144(HV-HDF中为2.3×10/ml,S-HD中为9.8×10/ml)和心肌细胞来源的连接蛋白43(分别为12.0和31.9×10/ml)的EV在HV-HDF中的增加幅度小于S-HD(交互作用分别为.03和.06)。血液浓缩校正减弱了所有变化,尽管血小板来源的EV在LV-HDF和HV-HDF中仍显著增加,且CD144和连接蛋白43的EV在S-HD中增加最多。IDH易感性不同的患者以及有或无IDH的透析过程中,EV释放相似。
大多数EV在HD和HDF过程中增加。关于血小板来源的EV,HDF似乎比HD生物相容性更差。考虑到与CV相关的EV,HV-HDF中的组织损伤似乎不那么明显。EV释放与IDH无关这一发现需要进一步证实。