Ostermann Thomas, Pawelkiwitz Martin, Cramer Holger
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Aug 26;16:961070. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.961070. eCollection 2022.
Mindfulness-based interventions are increasingly used in health, economic and educational systems. There are numerous studies demonstrating the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions in the educational sectors (primary, secondary, and tertiary). This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the current state of research on the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on the academic performance of students as measured by their grade point average (GPA). Literature search was conducted in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, PsycARTICLES, PubMed, and Google Scholar through March 2022. The inclusion criteria were: (1) the use of GPA as a measure of students' academic performance, (2) a sample that was subjected to a mindfulness-based intervention without medical indication, (3) the student status of the subjects. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model with the generic inverse variance method. The search included a total of 759 studies, of which six randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. In these trials, significant group differences for GPA were found with effect sizes ranging from = 0.16-1.62 yielding a significant overall effect of = 0.42 (95% CI: 0.15-0.69) and a low magnitude of heterogeneity of = 37%. In conclusion, the first results of this emerging research field seem promising. However, the exact mechanisms of action are still unclear.
基于正念的干预措施在健康、经济和教育系统中越来越多地被使用。有大量研究表明基于正念的干预措施在教育领域(小学、中学和大学)的有效性。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了以平均绩点(GPA)衡量的基于正念的干预措施对学生学业成绩有效性的研究现状。截至2022年3月,在心理学与行为科学文集、心理学文摘、医学期刊数据库和谷歌学术中进行了文献检索。纳入标准为:(1)使用GPA作为学生学业成绩的衡量标准;(2)样本接受了无医学指征的基于正念的干预;(3)受试者的学生身份。采用随机效应模型和通用逆方差法进行荟萃分析。检索共纳入759项研究,其中六项随机对照试验符合纳入标准。在这些试验中,发现GPA存在显著的组间差异,效应大小范围为=0.16 - 1.62,总体显著效应为=0.42(95%置信区间:0.15 - 0.69),异质性程度较低,为=37%。总之,这一新兴研究领域的初步结果似乎很有前景。然而,确切的作用机制仍不清楚。