Chęciński Maciej, Chęcińska Kamila, Chyży Izabella, Walkowiak Kamila, Turosz Natalia, Kosiński Bartosz, Zduński Sebastian, Chlubek Dariusz, Sikora Maciej
National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, Wołoska 137 Str., 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, Wojska Polskiego 51, 25-375 Kielce, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 15;14(16):5770. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165770.
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) injections and arthrocentesis are commonly used minimally invasive methods for treating temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Although considered safe, they can cause neurological complications. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize all identified evidence for neurological adverse events following intra-articular TMJ interventions. This review was based on a systematic search with BASE, DOAJ, PubMed, SciELO, and Semantic Scholar on 28 May 2025. It included primary studies involving patients diagnosed with TMDs who underwent intra-articular injections into the TMJ or were treated with arthrocentesis, and in whom neurological adverse effects associated with the intra-articular intervention were reported. Studies reporting non-specific symptoms or unrelated systemic conditions were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools. Results were presented in summary tables. The search yielded five eligible studies comprising 319 patients, of whom 320 neurological adverse events were reported. Included studies comprised a randomized controlled trial, two retrospective studies, and two case reports. Four studies had a low risk of bias, and one had a moderate risk of bias according to the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools. The proportion of patients affected ranged from 14% to 65% depending on the study design and intervention type. The most common adverse event was transient facial nerve (cranial nerve VII) paralysis, mainly involving the temporal and zygomatic branches. Less commonly reported complications involved the trigeminal nerve branches (V1, V3). There is also a single case of epidural hematoma with palsy of the oculomotor nerve (III). Most symptoms resolved spontaneously within a few hours to a few days. The use of local anesthesia and large volumes of irrigation (60 mL) during arthrocentesis increases the risk of complications. Attempts to explain the mechanisms of complications include local anesthetic diffusion, compression neuropraxia due to lavage fluid leakage, and corticosteroid neurotoxicity. One of the limitations of the study is the scarcity of data. Although most adverse events are mild and reversible, these findings highlight that precise, real-time guided injection and careful control of lavage volumes can minimize extra-articular spread of anesthetics or fluids, thereby reducing the likelihood of neurological complications. This study received no funding. PROSPERO ID number: CRD420251088170.
颞下颌关节(TMJ)注射和关节穿刺术是治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMDs)常用的微创方法。尽管被认为是安全的,但它们可能会引起神经并发症。本系统评价的目的是综合所有已确定的关于颞下颌关节腔内干预后神经不良事件的证据。本评价基于2025年5月28日在BASE、DOAJ、PubMed、SciELO和Semantic Scholar上进行的系统检索。纳入的主要研究涉及被诊断为TMDs且接受了颞下颌关节腔内注射或关节穿刺术治疗,并报告了与关节腔内干预相关的神经不良反应的患者。报告非特异性症状或无关全身状况的研究被排除。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的批判性评价工具评估偏倚风险。结果以汇总表形式呈现。检索产生了五项符合条件的研究,共319例患者,报告了320例神经不良事件。纳入的研究包括一项随机对照试验、两项回顾性研究和两项病例报告。根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的评价工具,四项研究偏倚风险低,一项研究偏倚风险中等。根据研究设计和干预类型,受影响患者的比例在14%至65%之间。最常见的不良事件是短暂性面神经(颅神经VII)麻痹,主要累及颞支和颧支。较少报告的并发症涉及三叉神经分支(V1、V3)。还有一例硬膜外血肿伴动眼神经(III)麻痹。大多数症状在数小时至数天内自发缓解。关节穿刺术中使用局部麻醉和大量冲洗液(60 mL)会增加并发症风险。对并发症机制的解释包括局部麻醉药扩散、冲洗液渗漏导致的压迫性神经失用症以及皮质类固醇神经毒性。本研究的局限性之一是数据稀缺。尽管大多数不良事件是轻微且可逆的,但这些发现强调精确、实时引导注射并仔细控制冲洗液量可将麻醉药或液体的关节外扩散降至最低,从而降低神经并发症的可能性。本研究未获得资金支持。PROSPERO注册号:CRD420251088170。