• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最佳封锁措施

Optimal lockdowns.

作者信息

Hebert David J, Curry Michael D

机构信息

Aquinas College, Grand Rapids, MI USA.

出版信息

Public Choice. 2022;193(3-4):263-274. doi: 10.1007/s11127-022-00992-4. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11127-022-00992-4
PMID:36091084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9449920/
Abstract

This paper provides a framework for understanding optimal lockdowns and makes three contributions. First, it theoretically analyzes lockdown policies and argues that policy makers systematically enact too strict lockdowns because their incentives are misaligned with achieving desired ends and they cannot adapt to changing circumstances. Second, it provides a benchmark to determine how strongly policy makers in different locations should respond to COVID-19. Finally, it provides a framework for understanding how, when, and why lockdown policy is expected to change.

摘要

本文提供了一个理解最优封锁措施的框架,并做出了三点贡献。第一,它从理论上分析了封锁政策,认为政策制定者系统性地实施了过于严格的封锁措施,因为他们的动机与实现预期目标不一致,且无法适应不断变化的情况。第二,它提供了一个基准,以确定不同地区的政策制定者应对新冠疫情的力度。最后,它提供了一个框架,以理解封锁政策预期如何、何时以及为何会发生变化。

相似文献

1
Optimal lockdowns.最佳封锁措施
Public Choice. 2022;193(3-4):263-274. doi: 10.1007/s11127-022-00992-4. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Psychotropic drugs consumption during 2020 COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns: Evidence of a surprising resilience of the drugs delivery system in France.2020年新冠疫情及封锁期间的精神药物消费:法国药品供应系统具有惊人韧性的证据
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023 Aug;73:48-61. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
3
Lockdowns lose one third of their impact on mobility in a month.封锁措施对流动性的影响在一个月内会减少三分之一。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 22;11(1):22658. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02133-1.
4
A Qualitative Study of Autistic Adults' Quality of Life During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdowns.一项关于新冠疫情及封锁期间成年自闭症患者生活质量的定性研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2023 Sep 1;5(3):311-324. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0035. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
5
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the physical activity environment in English primary schools: a multi-perspective qualitative analysis.新冠疫情对英国小学体育活动环境的影响:多视角定性分析
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb;12(16):59-104. doi: 10.3310/KLML4701.
6
Everyday emotional functioning in COVID-19 lockdowns.新冠疫情封锁期间的日常情绪功能。
Emotion. 2023 Dec;23(8):2219-2230. doi: 10.1037/emo0001226. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
7
Lockdowns, Bioethics, and the Public: Policy-Making in a Liberal Democracy.封锁、生命伦理与公众:自由民主国家的政策制定。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2023 Nov;53(6):11-17. doi: 10.1002/hast.1539.
8
Resilience during lockdown: a longitudinal study investigating changes in behaviour and attitudes among older females during COVID-19 lockdown in the UK.封锁期间的复原力:一项纵向研究,调查英国新冠疫情封锁期间老年女性的行为和态度变化。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):1967. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19480-z.
9
Trajectories of psychological distress over multiple COVID-19 lockdowns in Australia.澳大利亚多次新冠疫情封锁期间心理困扰的轨迹。
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Mar;21:101315. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101315. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
10
Quantifying the impact of pandemic lockdown policies on global port calls.量化大流行封锁政策对全球港口停靠的影响。
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2022 Oct;164:224-241. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Unintended consequences of lockdowns, COVID-19 and the Shadow Pandemic in India.印度封锁措施、新冠疫情及“隐性大流行”的意外后果。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Mar;7(3):323-331. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01513-5. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
2
Optimal lockdowns for COVID-19 pandemics: Analyzing the efficiency of sanitary policies in Europe.针对新冠疫情的最佳封锁措施:分析欧洲卫生政策的效率
J Public Econ Theory. 2021 Nov 12. doi: 10.1111/jpet.12556.
3
The political economy of drug and alcohol regulation during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间毒品与酒精管制的政治经济学
South Econ J. 2021 Apr;87(4):1175-1209. doi: 10.1002/soej.12496. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
4
Essential or not? Knowledge problems and COVID-19 stay-at-home orders.必要与否?知识问题与新冠疫情居家令
South Econ J. 2021 Apr;87(4):1229-1249. doi: 10.1002/soej.12491. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
5
Externality and COVID-19.外部性与新冠疫情。
South Econ J. 2021 Apr;87(4):1107-1118. doi: 10.1002/soej.12497. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
6
The FDA and the COVID-19: A political economy perspective.美国食品药品监督管理局与新冠疫情:政治经济学视角
South Econ J. 2021 Apr;87(4):1210-1228. doi: 10.1002/soej.12494. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
7
Public choice and public health.公共选择与公共卫生。
Public Choice. 2023;195(1-2):5-41. doi: 10.1007/s11127-021-00900-2. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
8
Fear, lockdown, and diversion: Comparing drivers of pandemic economic decline 2020.恐惧、封锁与转移:2020年大流行经济衰退驱动因素比较
J Public Econ. 2021 Jan;193:104311. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104311. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
9
Flattening the Mental Health Curve: COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Orders Are Associated With Alterations in Mental Health Search Behavior in the United States.平缓心理健康曲线:新冠疫情期间美国居家令与心理健康搜索行为的变化有关。
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Jun 1;7(6):e19347. doi: 10.2196/19347.
10
Systematic biases in disease forecasting - The role of behavior change.疾病预测中的系统偏差 - 行为改变的作用。
Epidemics. 2019 Jun;27:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 28.