• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危机时期的拼车出行:组织认同作为一种安全带

Carpooling in times of crisis: Organizational identification as a safety belt.

作者信息

Terrier Lohyd, Audrin Bertrand

机构信息

EHL Hospitality Business School, HES-SO, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Switzerland.

出版信息

Case Stud Transp Policy. 2022 Sep;10(3):1720-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2022.07.002
PMID:36092534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9443075/
Abstract

The purpose of this research is to understand how organizational identification and fear of Covid-19 influence individuals' attitudes, trust, and intention to carpool. For this study, 299 participants completed an online questionnaire in which we assessed their organizational identification, fear of Covid-19, perceived risks, attitude, trust, and intention to carpool. Results show that the relationship between individuals and their organization is an effective lever to promote carpooling. Our results confirm that individuals' trust level and attitude strongly determine carpooling intention. The results highlight a negative relationship between perceived risks and attitude, as well as trust; Covid-19 is also identified as an antecedent to perceived risks. Organizations implementing carpooling solutions should focus on developing organizational identification and address fears associated with Covid-19.

摘要

本研究的目的是了解组织认同和对新冠疫情的恐惧如何影响个人拼车的态度、信任和意愿。在本研究中,299名参与者完成了一份在线问卷,我们在问卷中评估了他们的组织认同、对新冠疫情的恐惧、感知风险、态度、信任和拼车意愿。结果表明,个人与其组织之间的关系是促进拼车的有效杠杆。我们的结果证实,个人的信任水平和态度强烈决定拼车意愿。结果突出了感知风险与态度以及信任之间的负相关关系;新冠疫情也被确定为感知风险的一个前因。实施拼车解决方案的组织应专注于培养组织认同,并应对与新冠疫情相关的恐惧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b749/9443075/11c8bde135e2/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b749/9443075/11c8bde135e2/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b749/9443075/11c8bde135e2/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Carpooling in times of crisis: Organizational identification as a safety belt.危机时期的拼车出行:组织认同作为一种安全带
Case Stud Transp Policy. 2022 Sep;10(3):1720-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
2
Trust-Based Cooperative Social System Applied to a Carpooling Platform for Smartphones.应用于智能手机拼车平台的基于信任的合作社会系统
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jan 27;17(2):245. doi: 10.3390/s17020245.
3
Organizational trust in times of COVID-19: Hospitality employees' affective responses to managers' communication.新冠疫情时期的组织信任:酒店员工对管理者沟通的情感反应
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Feb;93:102778. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102778. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
4
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
5
Fear of COVID-19 and Perceived COVID-19 Infectability Supplement Theory of Planned Behavior to Explain Iranians' Intention to Get COVID-19 Vaccinated.对新冠病毒的恐惧和感知到的新冠病毒易感性补充了计划行为理论,以解释伊朗人接种新冠疫苗的意愿。
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jun 22;9(7):684. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9070684.
6
A New Model for a Carpool Matching Service.一种拼车匹配服务的新模型。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 30;10(6):e0129257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129257. eCollection 2015.
7
Is organized carpooling safer? Speeding and distracted driving behaviors from a naturalistic driving study in Brazil.拼车是否更安全?巴西自然驾驶研究中的超速和分心驾驶行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:105992. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105992. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
8
The Mediating Role of Organizational Reputation and Trust in the Intention to Use Wearable Health Devices: Cross-Country Study.可穿戴健康设备使用意向的中介作用:组织声誉和信任的作用——跨国研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 9;8(6):e16721. doi: 10.2196/16721.
9
Random Regret Minimization Model of Carpool Travel Choice for Urban Residents Considering Perceived Heterogeneity and Psychological Distance.考虑感知异质性和心理距离的城市居民拼车出行选择随机后悔最小化模型
J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci. 2023 Mar 2:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s12204-023-2588-9.
10
The relationships between justice perceptions, trust, and employee attitudes in a downsized organization.裁员组织中公平感、信任与员工态度之间的关系。
J Psychol. 2006 Sep;140(5):477-98. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.140.5.477-498.

本文引用的文献

1
Climate change, environment pollution, COVID-19 pandemic and mental health.气候变化、环境污染、COVID-19 大流行与心理健康。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 15;773:145182. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145182. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
2
Perceived risk of infection while traveling during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from Columbus, OH.新冠疫情期间旅行时的感染感知风险:来自俄亥俄州哥伦布市的见解
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Jun;10:100326. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100326. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
3
The Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers' Cross-Platform Buying Behavior.
感知风险对消费者跨平台购买行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 29;11:592246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592246. eCollection 2020.
4
Prevention and control of COVID-19 in public transportation: Experience from China.公共交通 COVID-19 防控:中国经验。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Nov;266(Pt 2):115291. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115291. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
5
COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action.新型冠状病毒肺炎与工作场所:对未来研究和行动的影响、问题和启示。
Am Psychol. 2021 Jan;76(1):63-77. doi: 10.1037/amp0000716. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
6
The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation.《COVID-19恐惧量表:编制与初步验证》
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(3):1537-1545. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
7
What we can learn from five naturalistic field experiments that failed to shift commuter behaviour.从五个未能改变通勤者行为的自然主义实地实验中我们可以学到什么。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Feb;4(2):169-176. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0795-z. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
8
The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections.计划行为理论:反应与反思。
Psychol Health. 2011 Sep;26(9):1113-27. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995.