• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拼车是否更安全?巴西自然驾驶研究中的超速和分心驾驶行为。

Is organized carpooling safer? Speeding and distracted driving behaviors from a naturalistic driving study in Brazil.

机构信息

Department of Transportation, Graduate Program on Urban Planning, Federal University of Parana, Av. Cel. Francisco H. dos Santos, 100, Curitiba, Brazil.

Department of Transportation, Graduate Program on Urban Planning, Federal University of Parana, Av. Cel. Francisco H. dos Santos, 100, Curitiba, Brazil.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:105992. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105992. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2021.105992
PMID:33549972
Abstract

Carpooling consists of drivers and passengers sharing a journey and its costs. Nowadays, in the context of mobility as a service, organized carpooling encompasses a service and trust relationship between drivers and passengers, by matching common routes and splitting cost through mobile phone applications. Therefore, passengers expect a certain level of travel quality and safety. In this context, this research aims to verify the hypothesis that drivers in an organized carpooling situation (CP) show safer driving behavior in terms of speeding (SP) and mobile phone use while driving (MPU) in comparison with non-carpooling (NCP) drivers. The research is based on data from the Brazilian Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS-BR) conducted in the City of Curitiba, with 40.45 driving hours and a traveled distance of 895.87 km. Methodology included the selection of safety performance indicators on SP and MPU, use of nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test for safety performance indicator comparisons and Pearson Chi-Square to test the association between CP or NCP and low or high indicator values. Hypothesis test results point in the same direction and partially confirm the initial assumption that CP induces safer behavior in terms of speeding. The statistically sound results showed that CP drivers engaged in less speeding episodes and mobile phone use duration in comparison to NCP drivers, as well as lower speed while using a mobile phone. In addition, driver behavior in CP and NCP situations also differed in terms of the type of MPU, with the proportion of types of use that demand a higher level of visual and manual distraction being higher among NCP drivers. In summary, these results confirm the initial hypothesis of safer driving behavior during carpooling in terms of MPU while driving.

摘要

拼车是指司机和乘客共同分担行程及其费用。如今,在出行即服务的背景下,有组织的拼车包括司机和乘客之间通过手机应用程序匹配共同路线和分担成本而建立的服务和信任关系。因此,乘客期望一定的出行质量和安全水平。在此背景下,本研究旨在验证以下假设,即在有组织的拼车环境(CP)中,与非拼车(NCP)司机相比,司机在超速(SP)和驾驶时使用手机(MPU)方面表现出更安全的驾驶行为。该研究基于巴西自然驾驶研究(NDS-BR)的数据,该研究在库里蒂巴市进行,包括 40.45 小时的驾驶时间和 895.87 公里的行驶里程。方法包括选择 SP 和 MPU 的安全性能指标,使用非参数 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行安全性能指标比较,以及使用 Pearson Chi-Square 检验 CP 或 NCP 与低或高指标值之间的关联。假设检验结果指向同一方向,部分证实了最初的假设,即 CP 在超速方面诱导更安全的行为。具有统计学意义的结果表明,与 NCP 司机相比,CP 司机超速和使用手机的时间更少,使用手机时的速度也更低。此外,CP 和 NCP 情况下的司机行为在 MPU 类型方面也存在差异,NCP 司机使用手机时需要更高水平的视觉和手动分心的使用类型比例更高。总之,这些结果证实了最初的假设,即在驾驶时使用手机方面,拼车时的驾驶行为更安全。

相似文献

1
Is organized carpooling safer? Speeding and distracted driving behaviors from a naturalistic driving study in Brazil.拼车是否更安全?巴西自然驾驶研究中的超速和分心驾驶行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:105992. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105992. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Characteristics of driver cell phone use and their influence on driving performance: A naturalistic driving study.驾驶时使用手机的特点及其对驾驶性能的影响:一项自然驾驶研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105845. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105845. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
3
Naturalistic Driving Study in Brazil: An Analysis of Mobile Phone Use Behavior while Driving.巴西自然驾驶研究:驾驶时手机使用行为分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 3;17(17):6412. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176412.
4
Mobile phone use among commercial drivers in Ghana: An important threat to road safety.加纳商业司机使用手机:对道路安全的一项重大威胁。
Ghana Med J. 2018 Sep;52(3):122-126. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v52i3.3.
5
Drivers' gap acceptance behaviours at intersections: A driving simulator study to understand the impact of mobile phone visual-manual interactions.驾驶员在交叉口的视距接受行为:一项驾驶模拟器研究,旨在了解手机视觉-手动交互的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Apr;138:105486. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105486. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
6
Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.道路基础设施和交通复杂性对分心驾驶者速度适应行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
7
Characterizing phone usage while driving: Safety impact from road and operational perspectives using factor analysis.描述驾驶时的手机使用行为:基于因子分析的道路和运营视角的安全影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:106012. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106012. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
8
Gap acceptance behaviour and crash risks of mobile phone distracted young drivers at roundabouts: A random parameters survival model.环岛处使用手机分散年轻驾驶员注意力时的行车视距接受行为和碰撞风险:随机参数生存模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Oct;206:107720. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107720. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
9
Mobile phone use during driving: Effects on speed and effectiveness of driver compensatory behaviour.驾驶过程中使用手机:对驾驶员补偿行为的速度和有效性的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Sep;106:370-378. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
10
"It is frustrating to not have control even though I know it's not legal!": A mixed-methods investigation on applications to prevent mobile phone use while driving.“即使我知道这是不合法的,但却无法控制自己,这真令人沮丧!”:一项关于申请防止开车时使用手机的混合方法研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Mar;137:105412. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105412. Epub 2020 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational Traffic Accidents among Teachers in Spain.西班牙教师职业交通事故。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 24;19(9):5175. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095175.
2
Investigating the Effect of Social and Cultural Factors on Drivers in Malaysia: A Naturalistic Driving Study.研究马来西亚驾驶员的社会文化因素影响:一项自然驾驶研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 9;18(22):11740. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211740.